/ Logbooks - shortcomings observed
One route soloed in decidedly sketchy condition and logged with the suggestion that it was a grade lower. Saw it the next day and it definitely wasn't - anyone going looking for an easy tick of a classic route would have had a shock!
The final pitch of one route climbed as a variation finish to another. Both routes logged without explanation, even although only the top pitch of the former was complete. Anyone trying to climb the complete line on the basis of it having been logged would have also got a shock.
I'm not totally against the logbooks, but we do need to be aware that we are completely at the mercy of the person who logged it - much reading between the lines may be required...
Caveat Emptor Jamie.
People use the logbooks for many different reasons and in many different ways.
Using the logbooks as a true guide to what is going on in the hills is a bit like basing your politics around what you read on Facebook.
> Caveat Emptor Jamie.
> People use the logbooks for many different reasons and in many different ways.
> Using the logbooks as a true guide to what is going on in the hills is a bit like basing your politics around what you read on Facebook.
You aren't suggesting that facebook isn't right?
Because Charlene said that Tracey said that Trevor"s boyfriend was a slag and slept with Simone, but simone's friend big Tracey said that Charlene was a whore and a liar.
Anyway it was a grade V and wasn't frozen. ..
Thanks, I didn't want to name names and routes - people have been known to get upset - but you obviously figured it...
Sticking to objective facts as best you can I find helps rather than giving too much opinion. Information from someone you don't know will always have to be used with more caution than someone who you do. I interpret "It was a bit thin..." very differently depending on who has said it.
We shouldn't shoot the messengers though, and you have been careful not to do this Jamie. The person giving the info on the soloed route was trying to be helpful and having repeated the route the next day I can see what he meant. However, having done that route numerous times in varied conditions it was, as you point out, not in particularly easy condition. Fairly standard I'd say. Good pick placements all the way, ice usually poor for screws but if one looks around carefully some good screws available in places. At one point ice a bit hollow sounding so needed a lighter touch.
Mountaineers have always used each others beta, even before UKC. Keep it coming.
I seem to remember there are some imminent-ish changes that will make it much easier to separate personal comments from public ones. So someone could update a log to say a route was in easy condition, meaning (for example) that it was easier than the last time they did it, without publishing the fact and leading others to think it was easy per se
Elsewhere on the site
This Winter Conditions page gives a summary of what is being climbed at the moment, what is 'in' nick and what the prospects are... Read more
F ounded in 1993, Mountain Hardwear are a pretty young mountaineering clothing and equipment manufacturer but are also one of... Read more
On Saturday 13th December Greg Boswell and Guy Robertson kicked off their Scottish winter season early by making the... Read more
With four photos in this week's top ten, and a UKC gallery of stunning images we thought it was time we had a chat with... Read more
The Epicentre Mega Winter Sale starts in store 9am Christmas Eve. We have a great selection of in store only deals from... Read more
This years ROCfest will be slightly different. We've decided to run a Climbing Festival, not just a competition! Over... Read more