/ Demonstartion against proposed nuclear dump in Ennerdale
Out of interest, why isn't the demo in Ennerdale, or at least somewhere close?
> Out of interest, why isn't the demo in Ennerdale, or at least somewhere close?
Distinct lack of tea shoppes in Ennerdale?
In reply to Baron Weasel: In reply to Baron Weasel: i would go if i wasnt working.
I am not anti nuclear and i accept we have to look after the waste that exists
However i think safety first should be the approach, finding the best sites as a starting point
Not political expediency.
National Parks should be excluded until all other areas have been ruled out. Politicians in Cumbria are not elected by all the people who use and care about the National Parks so their motivations are skewed away from the majority of people who have a stake in the areas in question.
Any decision that affects a national park in such a major way should be acountable at a national level.
The demonstration i hope will alert more people to the threat to a beautiful quiet part of the lakes that should be a last resort not the first.
> Out of interest, why isn't the demo in Ennerdale, or at least somewhere close?
Being one of the most remote and unpopulated dales in the Lakes means there would be precious few people there to see the demo and be won over by the campaign, I guess, as opposed to hundreds of people in Bowness. They've already had a demonstration 'walk' along the possible path of construction vehicles in Ennerdale.
Any adoption of a nuclear waste facility requires the consent of the local population, so I've got no problems with anything that gets those people thinking about it well in advance. I'm sure there will be plenty of campaigning by those in favour of any plan.
>> To survey the Ennerdale valley could require areas to be sealed off for up to two years while drilling up to 60,000 holes and dynamiting to take place. This will be the siesmic survey. Also about sixteen deep bores will be drilled over ten years, up to seven at a time. Each drill pad is the size of a football pitch, fenced off and with twenty four hour lighting and noise. Access roads will need to be built. Goodbye Ennerdale. Does that
still merit consideration?
>> Sorry, I didn't realise that you had lost the thread.
Or the link to the weekend ITV news coverage at http://www.vimeo.com/56814575
To find more ideas on how to help, visit the website at www.noend.org.uk
That's a very well produced video, but seems to be based on the premise that the waste is going to be tipped straight into the lake and upset the fish in the stream it keeps banging on about constantly through the video. It's been done to death in thr other thread, but my 2p worth:
There are no plans for a repository under Ennerdale, it's all conjecture.
If there were there are far easier and cheaper ways to build it than the elaborate plans for the total destruction of Ennerdale mooted in the thread.
The waste is all currently stockpiled about 5 miles down the road, so Ebnerdale would be a lot safer with it buried beneath it.
The site should be selected on geology, not PR.
Err, sorry - you can either have safety first or you can pick and choose your geologically suitable facility according to whether or not it's in a pretty area. You can't have both.
Given that transporting highly radioactive waste is inherently risky (I guess; someone correct me if I'm wrong) it seems that the ideal solution would involve keeping the geographical distance to your geologically suitable facility to a minimum, yes? In which case, assuming the Ennerdale site is the closest suitable repositary, there shouldn't be an argument if you're sticking by your 'safety first' ideal.
Have you got a source for that rather hysterical quote?
Not all waste. We have a store 3 mile down the road albeit not in use until end of February.
Like you say It's all a pointless argument as there is no way there going elsewhere when Britains reprocessing plant is there already. The costs involved already are beyond believe. Maybe Tokyo might have it seeing as the contents of their reactors are spread all over the place anyway.
To be fair to Mockerkin - a drill site on land is generally football pitch size if it's an oil well, I suspect the sites maybe smaller for geotechnical investigations but I'll let someone more knowledgable than me comment on that.
Seismic surveys haven't used dynamit as the sound source for some time - we use trucks with vibrators as the sound source these days.
But the point is still valid if I was going to put a repository in the Ennerdale Granophyre - (which geologically speaking is probably as good a place as any) I'd want to understand in detail how the ground water moved through it (via fractures) - and it would seem pretty difficult to do that using seismic, so that means drilling, probably lots of it.
I reckon that would definitly have an impact on Ennerdale scenery and access.
Rad waste is currently moved from pretty much every corner of the country to sellafield at the moment so its a well understood process. Also not sure what arrangements will be made for future reactors.
The groundwater question is probs only an issue for the civil structure.Any where waste is stored water has to be strictly controlled for criticality reasons
I really think people should have a read up on current storage arrangements to realise we need a safer longer term option.
btw I work in the industry so I might come across as biased,the other way to look at is I have an indepth knowledge tbh I havent taken much interest into the repository until I saw some of the threads on here
Carefull now Magnox has a new super dooper IT contractor. : )
> Have you got a source for that rather hysterical quote?
> To be fair to Mockerkin - a drill site on land is generally football pitch size if it's an oil well, I suspect the sites maybe smaller for geotechnical investigations but I'll let someone more knowledgable than me comment on that.
RE. the seismic survey, you've just made me think about that. It also would be more destructive than is generally realised. Whether drill trucks, which prepare the site for dynamite charges and only drill a few feet down, vibrator trucks or weight trucks, which drop a three ton weight,(the descriptions are for UKCers not familiar with the industry) are used as the sound source, they will not need access roads as big and robust as the ones carrying heavy deep drilling gear, but there will have to be many more, widespread to cover the whole area, which is rough difficult terrain. If the dump is to extend under the lake, (it will be the size of Carlisle) will they also need to bring in a marine seismic survey team onto the lake using air guns as a sound source or could a seismic survey around the shores only, give a good refraction result to avoid that.
It's a while since I worked in the industry using all those methods so I need you to update me as much as I need to save Cumbria.
Devil's advocate here, but will they need significantly more roads than the numerous forestry roads already present, which the logger's artics and trailers seem to thunder about happily on?
Your points on surveying beneath the lake are interesting. I take it that could be potentially fatal to the fish and other species in thr lake?
> Devil's advocate here, but will they need significantly more roads than the numerous forestry roads already present, which the logger's artics and trailers seem to thunder about happily on?
>> Depends on whether the forestry roads go to where they want to do the survey. These seismic surveys need to cover a lot of ground.
> Your points on surveying beneath the lake are interesting. I take it that could be potentially fatal to the fish and other species in thr lake?
>> That has been a problem, can't remember if the rare arctic char fish is in Ennerdale, they moved some from Bassenthwaite to Scotland recently because of farmers polluting the lake. God knows what damages air guns would do. Personally I hope that the seismic land based surveys can produce
a clear picture. But a lot of it depends on computers to interperet the gathered data. Quantifying refraction can be a theoretical progresion to a computer, but shit in = shit out. Plus interference from Cumbrian and national politics will give the public a false view.
This isn't just a talking point here as it is with most UKC people, it is important.
Yep. Looks like a small group of people with little answers other than " no here"
Protest aside, some cracking shots of eskdale!
>> To fmck
I would like to apologise to you on behalf of all the people against the dump in Cumbria who don't agree with your opinion.
We didn't realise that you are a such a geological expert. We thought that you were simply someone who saw, on this site, a photo of a few people demonstrating against the dump, then dismissed them all out of hand.
To everyone else, do you realise that out of a population of about 400,000+ only 24 people will be making the next big decision on this. There will be no referendum for the people of Cumbria. Only the executives of the three councils involved will be allowed to vote, not all of those councillors, or the people. Don't bother replying that the people voted for the councils, because when the people voted, this problem wasn't in the total public domain.
Further, two of these three councils only represent West Cumbria. The other councils in Cumbria have no say, except for Cumbria County Council and as said only their executives will vote and their leader, a tory, will just kiss party arse.
The other two, labour council leaders, are so old fashioned in their thinking and short sightedness that they only think of a short term increase in jobs, which will give them kudos with their party but makes the mistake of ignoring the immediate devestation the construction will cause and long term problems.
The Cumbrian geology is fractured. Geoliogically the safest places in England (why not look at the whole of the UK) is in solid clay under London and Kent.
Many buffalo there.
Ok chief sleeping bull. You wise man.
Counting the numbers on the UKCLIMBING news aerial shot there isn't even a hundred people there. Count them!
The numbers Speak for themselves its a little minority that considers themselves experts!
Hmm don't think so.
> Counting the numbers on the UKCLIMBING news aerial shot there isn't even a hundred people there. Count them!
> The numbers Speak for themselves its a little minority that considers themselves experts!
>> You keep talking about a photo you have seen. You can't quote geological surveys. You aren't aware of the tens of thousands of people who have signed petitions against the dump.
Twenty four people, all of whom are politically bound to follow their party line to make a decision that the tens of thousands don't want and many others who haven't had it explained to them honestly is not democracy.
You don't live here. You don't know about the biased phone surveys which were directed only to Sellafield workers and their relations. Tick box questions which were so cleverly put that it was impossible to have a result against the dump and then put to the media as a yes vote from the Cumbrian people. You are so out of your depth on this one.
I can count!
I know when I smell porkies!
Come on its got nothing to do with democracy. We used electricity since the early 60s ( you had the choice to switch off then) now you have big leaky plants that are of no use to get rid of.
It's the price to pay from yesterday not today!
by - fmck on - 12 Jan 2013
In reply to sloth:
Therefore blasting out the rock hillside in order to provide parking. Yes very sensitive to the glen. NEXT!
He he! 100 still in my count or u counting all the toddlers n possibly the pets. : )
Time to go and buy a haulage business in the Lakes....
Have you contacted the Guardian or similar with these allegations? "Nuclear Industry Rigs Vote" would be national, if not worldwide headlines. The population of Copeland and Allerdale is about 160,000, so with at least 20,000 of the working population working for Sellafield or the supply chain you'd probably have to be highly selective not to interview them or their relatives.
That's not how I remember the questionnaire.
> Time to go and buy a haulage business in the Lakes....
>> Don't buy a truck now, Cumbria has refused the dump.
Put another way, the spoil coming out would have made a bund (bank) 10M high running for 1100KM...thats a few quids worth
Cant help think that long term if you put all the really high level waste in a rocket and blast it out of the galaxy it wouldnt actually prove any dearer...mind you, nothing ever goes wrong when lauching rockets....
Elsewhere on the site
A pack designed for year-round ascents. Super light, flexible, strippable and seasonally versatile you can rely on this perennial... Read more
Manchester Climbing Centre is showing Reel Rock’s Valley Uprising on Tuesday the 11th of November at... Read more
From a personal point of view, photographing the night sky is one of the most difficult, frustrating yet ultimately rewarding... Read more
Pete Whittaker has flashed the 32 pitch route Freerider 5.12d on El Capitan in Yosemite Valley over three days,... Read more
Nuts, wires, stoppers, chocks, wedges, whatever you want to call them, have been around for a long time. Initially made from... Read more