/ Which Canon DSLR?
Thinking about upgrading my Canon 1000d, looking for something around the £500 mark or less (body only). So far thinking about the 60d, but any recommendations appreciated.
The main requirements i'm looking for are:
- Fast continuous shooting (For handheld focus stacking)
- Low noise at ISO of 100-400 (preferably up to 800)
the 60D is a good option but it's geting on a bit and there's rumors canons going to relase a 70D later this year (doesn't make it any less of a camera, is value will just drop a bit). With what you've listed a second hand 7D sounds like its the thing your after; it's slight above what you've said your budget is but it's worth it.
digitalrev are selling it for £699 and amazon have them for the same price second hand:
oh and canon's winter cashback is still on (but you cant claim second hand or grey import digitalrev, however they do their own 1 year warranty) here's the link:
http://www.castlecameras.co.uk/canon-eos-650d-digital-slr-camera-body £519 before £50 cashback and not a grey import.
I agree with Max, stretch your pocket a little bit and buy a 7D, it will be a camera for life unless it breaks or you want to upgrade to full frame.
Anything bellow that, sooner or later you will realise that you want better.
dpreview.com has all the info you might need, there is also a forum.
Another 7D vote here: 7D likely to drop in price in the next couple of months as a replacement is strongly rumoured...
I've not managed to break mine and it's bounced down scree, been dripping wet and been dragged up a lot of climbs, crashing off the rock as i go.
A couple of points I would make are that you can read all you want and get an answer in your head, but until you go and play with the cameras (a bit harder with Jessops now gone) you won't get an idea for how they weigh up (literally) and which you find easiest to use. I looked across the spectrum and has almost decided to go for a 7D until I picked it up and played around with it and just found it too bulky and not user friendly enoough for what I wanted. It's a very personal choice and unless you have something very specific in mind that draws you towards one camera over another, I would reserve judgment until you handle them.
I suspect you may find yourself more limited by lenses and your own ability than the camera body. As to someone above who said the 7D (?) would last you your lifetime, well clearly it won't and you need to bear in mind that technology moves on so fast that you could easily find yourself in the market again in 5 years time regardless.
They're the same size aren't they?
New generation, but both physically the same size...
In a nutshell the main advantage the 60D has is an improved sensor and iso performance, and better LCD. I think the former two points are deal breakers for most people. There are many other more minor improvements. One must scan the specs and decide if this is needed and worth the extra cash i suppose.
The 50 & 60D have the same autofocus and same shutter and mirror. Advantages of the 50D, in addition to alloy body, is that is has a faster fps and also a manual lens adjustment built in (60D for some reason does not). Another important consideration is that the 60D doesn't take CF cards, which is a serious pain and financial blow if you have a nice collection of xGb CF cards (I know I wouldn't buy a second hand CF card).
Both are great cameras and I'm sure you wouldn't be dissapointed with either... Unless you drop your 60D when your fancy LCD screen is flipped out ;-) Apologies for the bias review!
I could have 60D 2nd hand immaculate condition for £450 or the 650D brand new for £440 (after canon £50 cashback offer).
I went for the 60D. It feels great, a solidly built camera and a much better size than my old 400D.
Whether it's worth the extra £200 is you compare brand new....
might be worth looking at this its a stright up comparison of the 2 http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-EOS-650D-vs-Canon_EOS_60D
Was comparing the noise/ISO levels on the 7d to the 1000d and it appears to only be 0.2 stops different. Would this even be noticeable (Only referring to ISO levels of 100-400)
Additional info: I've got no use for movies, will only be using the camera for stills, so I think that rules the 650d out? Mainly using it for landscapes and handheld macro.
Elsewhere on the site
From a personal point of view, photographing the night sky is one of the most difficult, frustrating yet ultimately rewarding... Read more
A pack designed for year-round ascents. Super light, flexible, strippable and seasonally versatile you can rely on this perennial... Read more
Manchester Climbing Centre is showing Reel Rock’s Valley Uprising on Tuesday the 11th of November at... Read more
Nuts, wires, stoppers, chocks, wedges, whatever you want to call them, have been around for a long time. Initially made from... Read more
Pete Whittaker has flashed the 32 pitch route Freerider 5.12d on El Capitan in Yosemite Valley over three days,... Read more