In reply to tobyfk:
> (In reply to Alan James - UKC)
>
> I am slightly confused by all this. Are we supposed to be impressed by people who climb big mountains on guided trips? Certainly I am impressed by Kenton summiting three times (what could he achieve if he didn't have to haul clients behind him ..?). But beyond this do 'client' trips reflect much more than having parents with deep pockets/ other access to the required dosh. Naturally I understand that it remains quite dangerous to climb Everest regardless of oxygen and sherpa support, but shouldn't we cheer more if the same individual climbed a lesser known 6000-7000m peak in good style under their own steam?
How many 19 year olds are organising their own expeds to 6000m peaks? Not many I wouldn't have thought. It costs a lot to go to the Himalayas and Everest still attracts sponsorship from outside climbing. Certainly there's not much support from the mountaineering world (though Rhys Jones was sponsored in some way by Cotswold). I'm not even sure if Kenton and co are getting anything from the BMC/MEF for their G IV exped this summer as it's not a 'new route'. It'll be interesting to see the results of the BMC's drive to promote 'real' climbing achievements. Though their new press and PR officer isn't in the office this week, so I doubt they would have picked up on Kenton's achievement as the only Brit to summit 3 times
These young guys weren't pioneering new routes, but I know for sure that Rhys was out for 20 hours on summit day. Which I'm impressed by. Everest will always attract a lot of media attention. 'Real climbers' will continue to knock it, but given the opportunity, most 'real climbers' would still love to climb Everest. I know Ian Parnell didn't pass up on the chance last year!