In reply to Fiend:
> (In reply to Dr.Strangeglove)
>
> [...]
>
> Is there any difference in the UKC reviews these days??
>
> Thankfully it is obvious that the reviews are adverts and equally obvious that UKC needs adverts to survive -
It would be nice to have a trust fund but ufortunately we don't!
As I said above:
There are four elements to that review.
1. An independent and unsolicited review from someone who bought the gear and used it.
2. A review from a climbing guide and journalist. (from Climbing magazine)
3. A note from the designer.
4. This thread where anyone can contribute.
Unlike magazine advertorial reviews there is no hiding on the internet. We have a forum here where everyone can contribute. When I talk to the gear manufacturers they actually prefer robust reviews and they like the fact that we can present gear on here and then all and sundry can comment about it here on the forums.
So if you have experience of this cam, speak up!
Personally I never rely on one gear review alone, especially when it comes to new gear. I google, I read the websites, I talk to mates who may have experience. The BMC is also a good source of information.
Stack the odds in your favour, by active not passive, after all it is your life.
Mick