In reply to Mick - Rockfax USA:
> Like you say everyone has their own opinion on things - included art. Does that not make us all art critics? And hey - we can all make paper planes - that's art (and science) and we can all critique them.
Can't agree with any of that, me ol' mucka mickey. Sadly, too many people won't even consider walking through the door of a gallery, let alone consider the work inside. It's easy to see a pile of bricks on telly and think "All modern art is bollocks.", but that's prejudice, not an opinion. It's easy to look at the Mona Lisa on the same page as a Boulder on a Lawn, and say "The one on the left is beautiful, therefore it is Art, but the one on the right is just a giant rock." That's illogical, and misses the point of Art.
With regard to this particular piece of Art, it could be that the artist is taking the piss, and it's just a piece of rock on a lawn. Bearing in mind however that it's intended to be viewed with climbers on it, then I imagine some people might think it's a metaphor for the ultimate futility of all mankind's trivial pursuits on the planet. Whether the artist intended them to think that or not, as far as those viewers are concerned, it's Art. To most people here however, it will remain a heinous figure of four to the sprag, then a slap for the top.
Which is cool, and would completely flummox the cravate-wearers.
Jeez, sorry, I'm rambling again. Nuff. What happened to the Fish's trip to Fife?
See ya,
al