In reply to Fauvé:
> (In reply to Will W)
> Unfortunately you then let yourself down.
> Assuming someone elses view is just wrong for no other reason than in your opinion it is wrong, is a bad trait that will trip you up later in life.
Ok what I said was that you are wrong, with regards to the photos from Lochnagar, not for no reason other than my opinion, but for the fact the coire and climb were in full winter nick.
That route was very much in winter condition. The turf, of which there is quite a bit was rock solid. It was also a very dry weekend with little moisture about, so the rock doesn't perhaps look pretty, white, and well hoared up, but cracks were chocked with neve and verglas from a couple of days of freeze thaw action.
As I have said before pictures looking down the climb show how "white" it looked.
To you it didn't look in winter nick, that maybe just because its not white. I assure you I was very glad of my tools and crampons.
My other point was that in the grand scheme of things it doesn't really matter, its a short grade IV that any man and his dog could get up. This thread was about a route at the top end of the scale. Eriks comments earlier hit the nail on the head, it might well have been plucked in its very best condition. It doesn't look white in the photos but I am certain if the two of them say it was in winter nick, then it was. Thats one hell of a lot of experience people are questioning, from 3 pics on the web.
I might be wrong, but I don't think I am.