UKC

Crux Plasma down jacket.

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
anyone got one, just read a review in this months climber and it looks brilliant and exactly what i'm after but it's a fair wedge at £275!

http://www.crux.uk.com/en/crux_clothing_down_plasma_jacket.php
henrik1224 30 Nov 2008
In reply to andrew sandercock:
Yes, I have one. It's very, very lovely. Superlight, loft about the same as a Rab Neutrino Endurance, but more 'underfilled' - either the down is highly spec or they're allowed to loft more because of the very light fabric and fully baffled construction. It's waterproof. It breathes and thermo-regulates like it's made with pertex.
It is very well tailored and sewn.
Big hats of to Crux on this one. Got the new Halo top too. It's warm, it's light and I actually look good in it. I like it very much.

Apart from the obvious fact, that you get what you pay for (excellent workmanship and alpinist-specific details), I don't think that £275 is unreasonable for a waterproof, hooded medium-fill down jacket.
I don't work for crux or have anything to do with them.
(rant start) But I do like their products, high-spec materials and a unique fit, and don't understand why people whine about something like the Flak jacket being expensive at £200 - and then gladly buy an Arc'teryx Alpha SV at more than twice the price, which don't fit normal climbers any more. (rant over)
 droites 01 Dec 2008
In reply to henrik1224:
I know it is a waterproof down jacket, but how waterproof? Do y
ou think it could be used as a belay jacket in Scotland or stick with synthetic?
Thanks


yes it's 100% waterproof due to the event fabric used and the use of welded rather than stitched seams, bit unsure about putting it on over wet gear though.
henrik1224 02 Dec 2008
In reply to speedysi:
The plasma hasn't been on the market that long, and I've only had mine for a couple of weeks. I've owned and abused many of the currently available down and synthetic "belay"-type jackets, including the DAS, Arc'teryx Dually and Neutrino Endurance.
My take is: Go with down. Almost always. Down is sooo much warmer for the weight compared to any synthetic fiber, no matter what producers tell you. It compresses so much better too, and drapes much better which, in turn, equals better thermo-regulation and maximum warmth (no drafts). It's more expensive, yes, but it will last longer, and gives so much more enjoyment.
The plasma is waterproof, completely. I know Scandinavia isn't Scotland, but have used this jacket belaying in a few torrential autumn storms here in Denmark and Sweden already. It was completely dry.
No problem with moisture from inside either, though my shell was sodden from rain, sleet and hail. Here is some food for thought.
1. consider how much water it takes to properly drench down (try with a good quality sleeping bag). It takes a lot. The better the down, the better will it dry out - there's more air and less material. The better the shell "breathes", the better it dries out. Event breathes much better than a lot of "kiss-coated" nylons.
2. consider how much water is actually contained in snow. Not very much, even in wet snow. If you just a little bit careful, and don't shove buckets of snow into your jacket just before you are putting it on, you're fine. Spindrift and the like doesn't seriously impede the loft of a hi quality down jacket. I've personally used the Neutrino Endurance and even a lightweight Klättermusen down pullover (with uncoated pertex quantum) as over-jackets for many days out climbing in norway and sweden. No problem.
3. I personally wouldn't use down for items such as handwear and pants in moderate climates like GB, the Alps or most of Scandinavia. Why? Because these are often more in contact with snow (sitting or digging) and they tend to compress the insulating material (sitting or grabbing things), not exploiting the full potential of down. A cheaper, synthetic, alternative might just as well be used. If you tend to get very cold, bring a pair of down mitts. Or just an uninsulated pair of over-mitts. They are surprisingly effective.

4. Synthetics aren't "warm when wet". A high-quality continuous fibre like polarguard 3d has a better retention of loft in extremely wet environments (when you absolutely KNOW you will drench your jacket or bag, or on extremely long trips without any means of drying out your bag or jacket - a sunny day will usually dry out any down bag or jacket, even in deep cold). BUT - no material will dry out by itself. It requires body-heat. There's not much fun in drying out any material, and it will cool the body. So don't get your stuff wet in the first place. A down jacket used as a belay jacket won't be wet, just a bit damp. Usually less damp than a thickly wadded fiber-fill jacket, because there's just less matter for the moisture to condense on.
Here's a few pointers on sleeping warm too; Dig a snow shelter. Just dig into the side of whatever you can find. It doesn't have to be big. Just dig in and after about 30-40 dig to the sides to form the sleeping chamber. easy. They're warm, windproof (no flapping nylon stealing sleep) and usually stormproof. Remember, you are digging where spindrift is deposited to - not taken from, so little risk of the roof being blown away. I don't get the point about snow shelters being especially damp. A tent, even a double-wall, is just as damp when loads of snow have covered it. And since a snow hole is so much warmer, you are much more inclined to ventilate properly. This is essential. Take off all shell clothing and mid-layers. Change socks. Change liner gloves (even during the day. Everything is probably quite damp, especially when the rubbed-in ice starts to melt. You don't want to dry them in your sleep, which is when you produce the least heat. They don't give much insulation and will give you a terrible night's sleep if worn, because you will feel cold and clammy, no matter what the insulation. Put them on the next morning and dry them while actually moving. Bring a warm sleeping bag (using down will offset the extra weight). If necessary drop the down jacket and insulated pants in exchange for a thicker sleeping bag. 700 grammes of jacket and 600 grammes of trousers equals a lot of warmth when put in a sleeping bag. The knowledge that you can dig a snow hole or snow trench and lie down in a warm sleeping bag is worth a lot. Then comes all the tricks; hot water bottles, zipping shell jacket over sleeping bag etc. But dig that snow hole first.

5. What I especially don't like about synthetics is how they somehow imply that we all climb around in terribly weather for many, many days dunking our sleeping bags in freezing-cold waterfalls all the time. But waterproof pack-bags are on the market. It's relatively easy to avoid a catastrophic soaking. Besides, if things are THAT bad then a lot of things are probably going very wrong, and you should (in my opinion) focus on retreat. In these cases, it doesn't really matter whether your parka is made of fibre-fill or down.
Granted, there may be instances where synthetics are the right choice. But they're definitely for specialists. For everything else, even wet and wild winter climbing, down is warmer, lighter more packable and the better investment.

Kind Regards,
Henrik
 droites 02 Dec 2008
In reply to andrew sandercock:
Exactly my thoughts. Yes it has a waterproof/taped outer, but I wonder how it would perform when worn over a Paramo Aspira/Latok Alpine on a typical winter day(crap) being repeatedly taken on and off at belays etc. Just playing devils advocate as I am seriously thinking of getting one-if it up to the job!!
henrik1224 02 Dec 2008
In reply to speedysi:
Short answer, no problem. Moisture from inside (including rain-soaked shell clothing) doesn't affect down much worse than synthetics - contrary to popular wisdom. For seriously long stuff, more than 3 days in incredibly bad weather - and NO possibility for drying out stuff - then synthetics have some good qualities. For one- or two day use down is always best. It recovers remarkably well when hung to dry over the night.
Feel free to ask more - and do try and get a good quality sleeping bag drenched, it's surprisingly hard.
Kind regards,
Henrik
 thin bob 02 Dec 2008
In reply to henrik1224:
i've just got to say .... what a fantastic answer!
Good work, Henrik!
 TobyA 02 Dec 2008
In reply to henrik1224: I looked at their website - why have they made a non helmet compatible hood? That seems really weird on such a specialist jacket?
In reply to TobyA:

i'm just worried they're going to pull the stunt of releasing one in 6-12 months with a helmet compatible hood so get even more sales.
 droites 02 Dec 2008
In reply to TobyA: Just noticed that myself. Silly idea really for a technical jacket. Mmmm, have to ponder that one. Otherwise looks like a great jacket.
henrik1224 02 Dec 2008
In reply to andrew sandercock:
I'm not with crux, so no good answers to that one.
It fits over my Petzl Elios. though. Fits well under too. It is not a big hood like on the DAS. But definitely enough for belay work.
Hope that helps...
henrik1224 02 Dec 2008
In reply to henrik1224:
Oh, and check the size of the hood compared to the Neutrino Endurance. It's the same - and that works well as a winter belay jacket too. So, don't get to worried about it
henrik1224 02 Dec 2008
In reply to henrik1224:
A short elaboration. The hood on the plasma, as on most down technical down jackets, is smaller than on, say, the DAS or the Dually. It much bigger, though, than on something like the TNF Redpoint Optimus. It's big enough for a climbing helmet, but you have to pull it and put it properly in place, whereas with the DAS you can just pull it over your head.
BUT it is much more form-fitting when on, and this prevents drafts. My opinion is, that crux is being too conservative with regards to the helmet compatibility. But it is definitely not cavernous like the one on the DAS or the Dually - these jackets are quite special in that regard, but they are overall very specific jackets. I would go and check out a plasma, see how it fits, how the hood fits etc.

With regards to the cunning sales strategy - hmmm, not sure that is the way I would go if I were a small, cutting-edge company with only - 12? - products in the entire line-up. It's not like they spray out new products every season.


Appreciate the thank you above, by the way. Very nice to know, that I can be of any help. Feel free to ask questions, should anyone have any.

Kind Regards,
henrik
sparky750 26 Dec 2008
In reply to henrik1224:


Any idea where you can view a size guide for the jackets this jacket sounds like just what i'm after but sadly there are no stockists where i live to try one so it will have to be an internet order. I'm 6'1 48" chest so i'm guessing the XL but i don't want to find it's too small
sparky750 28 Dec 2008
In reply to sparky750:

Ok guys on saturday i took a drive down to v12 in wales to try a crux myself the xl fits it's not massively roomy but it fits i was out scubadiving today so the jacket got wet and blasted with wind worked a treat very happy with it.
 bare_feet 29 Dec 2008
In reply to andrew sandercock: Got one, love it! I'm a smallish woman and the XS is perfect. They aren't on their website yet, but Up and Under in Cardiff (www.upandunder.co.uk) have them for about £255. I got one from the shop, but I know they are sending them out to people.
 smallerrich 30 Dec 2008
In reply to andrew sandercock: Worth the pennys, love it.

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
Loading Notifications...