In reply to AG:
First off - is there a transcript of the interviews online anywhere - I find it hard to use iPlayer as I'm currently not in the UK......
One of the glorious things about the Scottish hills that sets them apart from those on the continent is the very fact that there are no waymarkings. In a country as densely populated as Britain, it's marvellous that there are still places where one can walk for days in beautiful scenery in mid summer and not see anyone. These wild places are extraordinarily special and need to be kept this way. I don’t suggest keeping people from the hills - they are, of course, not just for the enjoyment of the few. However, unnecessary impact should surely be avoided. Generally, I'm pretty laissez faire about developments in the hills - I wouldn't condone retrobolting a line, but I have neither the skills nor the balls to go on a bolt chopping mission. I wouldn’t add to a cairn, but I wouldn't unilaterally remove one either. However, for me, signposting is a completely different matter. These additions to the hills would be intrusive, and I fail to see what purpose they would serve. Arguments about them reducing erosion have already been demonstrated to be complete fallacy, as have those suggesting that they would be useful for assisting those in trouble (in bad weather, for example) to get down. The only purpose they will serve is to bring more people into the hills who do not (yet) have the skills to be in those places. This is not an elitist attitude, and to suggest so similar to suggesting that having a driving test is elitist. People are not allowed to drive alone on British roads without having taken a test because they are both a danger to themselves and everyone else on the roads. Personally, I'm not too concerned if people are going to be a danger to themselves, but what about the MRT who have to go and pick them up when they've missed a signpost in mist and risk their own necks into the bargain? Would you call the hills, or the weather itself elitist? For sure, in winter, it discriminates very heavily against those without warm clothing.... should we build heated, covered walkways up our mountains for winter usage? Of course not. Map and compass skills are not elitist - nor are they difficult to learn. It is indeed the least you can do to reduce your chance of needing to burden other people with rescuing you. You need not go on an expensive course, you just need to build up experience gradually, one step at a time.
I don’t object to all signposting in all hilled areas of the UK- for example, signs in Glenridding in the lakes telling you the direction for the path up Helvellyn are very useful - but also very different in that they are still in a village, and can hardly be compared to being in the real wilderness areas of Scotland. Nor do I object to all human intervention in the hills - paths in Torridon have been vastly improved due to the dedication of volunteers turning them from dirt tracks to being paved with the natural stone. This is clearly a human intervention, but one done to prevent further erosion and scarring of the landscape. However, constructing paths is about REDUCING man's impact on the environment, and signposting can in no way be said to do the same.
I have enjoyed many a walk on the way marked paths of the US or continental Europe (I currently live in Bavaria, so I’m pretty familiar with them), however, if this were not already the status quo, or, if you wish, “local ethic”, then I would object just as strongly to them. I for one feel it removes part of the challenge, enjoyment, and beauty of these wild places to have such waymarks in place. For me, people don’t have a right to be in these places, we must merely pass through, and to leave more than the bare minimum sign of human impact in these landscapes feels on some level to be vandalism.
Ok, ranting over. What I would really like to know is, having not been able to listen to the debate, who is proposing this? To whom can I write? What are the chances of this actually coming into place? And finally, having seen the unanimous and passionate consensus of this forum (which I realise is no way a fair representation of the public at large etc. etc.), do people think that, should these signposts come into existence, we will see parties akin to bolt choppers heading into the hills with a hacksaw to remove these signs?
Tim