In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:
> (In reply to Gordon Stainforth)
> [...]
>
> Fascinating, what's that a euphemism for Gordon?
What's what a euphemism for? 'Contender' was simply a deliberately vague word I chose to describe those who are going for the biggest sport challenges.
I've never been into sport climbing, but it seemed like quite an apt term for that. (But then I was never a contender - said in a suitably Brandoesque drawl in my advancing years.)
>
> Times have changed Gordon, despite what some like to project, there is no league table of climbers, just love of the rock and the cliffs, love of each other and a collective desire to do well, help each other, and experience the collective psychic rewards of the climbing experience whether you climb Hard V. Diff or 9b+.
Did you ever read my 'Eyes to the Hills', which said more or less exactly that, in even stronger terms? I was pretty rude about the league table approach also in my Peak book and came in for some stick for it.
>
> Adam, if I may be so familiar to use his first name, would, I am sure, be welcomed by his bros and sistas at Malham, Kilnsey and Gordale.
I'm sure. Did I ever suggest otherwise? I suspect that most climbers in Yorkshire would be absolutely thrilled to see someone of his skill on their own turf.
>
> Peace bro...
Precisely.