/ Climb Magazine
The reason for it is photos look better in gloss. Considering both guys behind it are top photographers, i think they should know that gloss is better.
I'm not saying the photos arent better. Just the 'look and feel' of the magazine was a lot nicer when it was matt
Nobody like change.
When they introduced the matt finish, people didn't like it, now they've gone back to gloss, and people don't like it again ;-)
I haven't read it since the switch from papyrus.
> Nobody like change.
> When they introduced the matt finish, people didn't like it
I liked it (aside from the smell, but they seemed to sort that out pretty quickly)
I've not read it yet, but was a bit disappointed at a quick glance. Presumably it's gone back to glossy to be a bit more outstanding and Alpinisty, so hopefully it'll be a good read still.
i loved the change to the matt. the gloss almost makes it look cheep.
And why is it that both climb and climber end up having the same stories? i can understand them both having a article on a big fist ascent or something like that, but this month they both have an article on Joe Brown. I found both articles interesting but why do they seem to have them at the same time?
Elsewhere on the site
Everybody who has used a gas cartridge stove in cold conditions knows the lower the temperature, the poorer the performance of... Read more
I am Matthew Phillips, I'm nearly 14 and I was born without my right arm below the elbow. I started climbing at taster... Read more
Nick Livesey discovered the mountains of Snowdonia over a decade ago and finally moved there a year and a half ago, quitting a... Read more
WINTERFEST 2014 at Outside in Hathersage 6th and 7th December 2014 Outside's ever popular Winterfest event is back... Read more
As a long-standing name in the UK rockshoe market, Scarpa have a loyal following and many much-loved models. As a fan... Read more