In reply to Gareth H:
My view of the whole affair for what it’s worth.
Ok, from what has been said via the eye witness report and the forum response to his actions by Callum, it is clear that Callum does not think the same way as we do. We might not like it but we have to respect that fact the Callum has different views to others and he is not afraid to express those views which shows in what he does. Please don’t misinterpret that statement as agreement with tooling on grit, of course I don’t agree with it. Anyone who knows me will vouch that I attempt to climb to my own very strict ethics as do the majority of UK climbers. I love grit, the history, the routes, the danger… I’ll never advocate tooling on grit same as I wouldn’t bolt grit. My views are shared with countless others but there is one thing that appears to have been overlooked. Callum does not share these views. No doubt he has discussed ethics and questioned his own ethics but it is clear that he believes what he believes and his belief is so strong, he won’t be persuaded otherwise. I doubt very much anything is going to change that. There may be some UKC’ers that would like to see bolts on grit and they may give a good argument for it but it is another thing entirely to actually go out and do it. That is what Callum has done - he believed tooling on grit to be fair game, put his money where his mouth was and went and did it. Fair play to his strong character, however that doesn’t forgive his arsey attitude when challenged about his activities nor the damage done to a historic crag.
We need to accept a few things here, firstly, no amount of slagging off, threats etc is ever going to help the situation, Callums’ mindset is likely to be far too strong for that, like I pointed out before, he believes what he believes. We can’t stop him tooling any crag he wants and there may be a strong argument saying that we don’t have that right anyway. What will come next if we climbers do not address the situation sensibly? The first DT accent of Great North Road? Right unconquerable? TPS? Perhaps there are many that do not share our ethics and are only waiting in the wings for someone to kick start a revolution, there could be tooling going on all over the place in the future and despite a long historical ethical argument, we would be powerless to stop it. I’m pretty sure I won’t be pushing my ethical beliefs if someone got arsey with me and they are armed with a pair of axes and pointy boots!
It is clear that our sport is diversifying, it always has been. I’ve been a climber through the sport revolution, bouldering, headpointing etc all off these are valid parts of climbing and were the subject of debate at the time and perhaps they still are. Perhaps it is inevitable this is where we’d end up – transport is easy for all, gear is cheap and easy to get hold of, information has never been easier to access. Many climbers have tasted winter climbing and love it, they want that thrill all year round. More and more climbing walls are allowing tooling, look at the figfour ‘axes’ as evidence that there is a demand for this. We as climbers need to make a choice – move with the times and play an active role in the future or live in denial and be dinosaurs. Tooling is only going to get ever more popular and if we want to protect our beloved crags, alternative venues need to be sourced. We can be part of this and we need to be. So where then? It needs thought and discussion, which goes without question. How about a small area of a sport crag set aside for tooling? Would we as climbers be happy with a trade off? For example, Millstone and the like remain free of tooling as anyone in the area who wishes to go tooling would use a dedicated venue, agreed by the majority – Dukes quarry perhaps? the little quarry near Windgather maybe? Perhaps new rock needs to be developed, from memory there is plenty of limestone on the steep sides of Monsall Dale for example. I have offered UKC a few times the suggestion of the railway cuttings that line the Tissington and High Peak trails, Yes they’d need work, yes they’d need bolting but has that stopped the sport climb developers over the years? No of course it hasn’t. There is potential for hundreds of short routes in these cuttings that have never yet seen a climber….
IMO the Uni club has no responsibility for Callums actions outside of club activities, it seems to me they have done all they can do. If you were a member of a car club for instance, is it right for them to ban you from the club because you happen to think the 70mph motorway limit is too slow? Of course not, peoples views and opinions can not be altered if they themselves hold their beliefs strongly. We are powerless to make people think the same way as we do, we are powerless to stop people from tooling, chipping, bolting, toproping etc etc. The crags are not ‘ours’ exclusively, they belong to the people and we must see that.
To end this I will say I have stifled my anger and attempted to suppress it, of course I’m angry by the Millstone events, as I was when it happened locally here in Lancashire at Denham quarry. My anger isn’t going to help though is it?
Callum:
You sir are a f**king arse. There, I said it. Partly for the damage you have done to a historic crag but mainly for the distain you have shown your peers. We are all climbers together, I’m no boulderer but I respect the views of boulderers even though they are not my own views. You ignored advice given to you on the day and because of that you have now lost all credibility you may have once had. Silly lad, if its fame you wanted, your ethical beliefs could have been used in a better way and you could have spearheaded a tooling revolution in the Peak. Sure you’d have to search out new crags and put some effort in, still, it didn’t stop Gary Gibson did it and look what Gary has given to climbing….
Blanchie