/ NEW ARTICLE: VIDEO: How to Tie Off a Belay Plate
Read more at http://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/page.php?id=3295
This might be a daft question, but what's wrong with tying an overhand knot before the belay device? Wouldnt that work instead?
dont think you can tie one of those when there is weight on the rope can you? or do you mean the other side of the plate (the dead rope side?)
The method shown in the video adds friction to the system and can be tied without introducing any slack into the system. It's a good "belt and braces" system but is by no means the only method to lock off a plate.
Nice video. I think that you should insert some comment about watching your fingers when unlocking the final loop. A bit of carelessness can lead to trapped or amputated finger ends.
I think it would take a great deal of carelessness to manage that. The force making the loop-which-your-fingers-are-momentarily-in smaller is just you tugging on the dead end. Because the plate is locked off at all times, if you're doing it even vaguely right then there will not be some magic death loop which is suddenly being constricted by the weight of your dangling climber. Maybe you were imagining some other scenario I've not considered?
Can this be used for locking a belay plate using a DMM Belay Master? I find that the plastic clip seems to take up most of the free space on the carabiner.
Instead I've tried putting a clove hitch onto a separate carabiner with the dead rope, but this is tricky to release under tension.
You are correct you would need to be very careless. However, if for some reason the plate wasn't properly locked off, it would be possible for the weight of the climber to be applied to the loop. Just mentioning that you should keep your fingers away from the inside of the loop would be fine. It might seem OTT, but it's one simple action to avoid a possible accident.
It's a bit like relying on the brake on a chain saw to work properly when you are trying to extract something from the chain when the engine is running:)
That is complete BS. How the hell do you climb routes otherwise?
> Can this be used for locking a belay plate using a DMM Belay Master? I find that the plastic clip seems to take up most of the free space on the carabiner.
> Instead I've tried putting a clove hitch onto a separate carabiner with the dead rope, but this is tricky to release under tension.
You can adapt the method slightly, and instead of tying the half hitches around the back bar you take the dead rope through the krab and tie the knot on the live rope instead.
i.e. When sitting on the edge of a gritstone crag with my anchors somewhere behind me, a whole heap of friction of the rope over the edge of the crag and down the route etc it's great. On a vertical, bolted multipitch limestone route abroad I'd rather have my Reverso attached to the anchors in guide mode, or at least the rope running from me up to a crab in the anchors, then down to the second (if you see what I mean) so that I'm not having to hold their full weight if they come off and want to rest for 10 minutes.
The ATC instructions... http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/uploads/black-diamond/files/MM5853_F_Belay_devicesWEB.pdf
I can't see any special instructions for belaying a second on it? How did we all survive before guide plates were widely stocked?
I'm not disagreeing that it is very uncomforatble to hold a free-hanging climber on a traditional belay plate, and it is definitely wise to avoid it by using an extra anchor (something you learn after the first time you do it!). I just don't think it is wrong to use these devices to bring up a second.
Surely the quality of the anchors is the key consideration in whether to use a magic plate or similar in a direct belay?
> . I just don't think it is wrong to use these devices to bring up a second.
Nor do I. Like I say, it's what I do all the time, and it's what you see everyone at every British crag doing! I just remember being surprised when I realised that in the Petlz literature it said it's only for belaying a lead climber or to be used in guide mode. It made me question my technique and safe practice, which I think is always a good thing to reflect on - am I being as safe as I can be? As ever in climbing you're balancing lots of different factors with safety, speed, convenience, available anchors, body position etc. It's part of the fun/challenge/art of traditional climbing that I enjoy.
Yes, it is!
So one author's opinion against manufacturer's recomendations and millions of man hours of experience? It's a valid opinion, but I don't believe that this is a black and white issue by a very long way.
Thank you for changing from "complete BS" to "Valid opinion" in 1,5 hours.
It is always refereshing to have a look how things are done over the fence by the neighbourgh and to learn why they might do things different.
All I did, was pointing out, what the producers recommend and donīt recommend (and by the way the Swiss, Austrian, French and German Alpinclubs teach their Guides).
I'm not saying that I have changed. Your original post was BS. You stated that the device was being used wrongly. I posted the instructions for the device in question, and it was being used according to the instructions. Therefore, your first post was wrong. When you fleshed it out a little more, it was clear that there was some validity to the opinion which I do agree with in part. Indeed, I tend to use an direct belay in alpine style terrain or where you have excellent anchors in a good position, but on UK crags, the direct belay is often not a good choice due to the position of anchors and size of ledges etc.
I think this is partly because of our use of double ropes, and partly because "guide mode" use of belay devices works fine for guiding on relatively easy ground but is impractical for looking after a second properly on tricky ground, where reversing a move or two is necessary as the climber tries to work out a sequence.
So from Petzl's point of view it is expedient to recommend "guiding mode" as there is no doubt that it is easier to manage the rope using a direct belay if all you are doing is taking in the slack as the climber progresses. So locking of the plate becomes redundant, as the device is used in a self-locking mode. However, for trad climbing the belay method that I've shown is more practical, for the reasons described above. Over the years I've held literally hundreds of falls, and although it is uncomfortable to hold a second who is hanging in space it is possible - however in this situation the ability to lock of the plate as shown in the video becomes vital.
Thank you Steve for your video and your answer.
You gave a good explanation for the British way of using the belay plate.
All I pointed out was, that it is not the way the producers recommend. (Even if "Monk" seems to think so).
I understand the reasons of this way of belaying, especialy in your climbing enverionment and that this method is optimal for the second who wants to reverse a move or needs to be lowered (therefore is the guide modus with its "autolocking" uncomfortable). But essential for this method is, that you have enough holdingpower in your brakehand.
What about belaying two followers with halfropes? One needs slack the other is moving up. The ropemanagment seems to me quite challenging.
And what about belaying a real heavy second and catching his fall and holding him for a while? Canīt it become quite uncomfortable for the belayer holding the brake rope with a lot of drag? Okay, thats why you show how to tie of the rope, but is this realy a solution for the moment the rope gets loaded with the fall?
What I learned is, that the brakingforce of the tube is quite small when both ropes run parallel out of the tube. When belaying a leader from the ground Iīm quite sure you teach, even when topropeing and no leadfall is to expect, that the brake hand has to be under the belayplate because of the necessary brakeforce. Why has this not to be observed when belaying your second from above? If 99,99 % of the British climbers do so (as metioned above from somebody) with out having any troble with it, why donīt the manufacutures react and recommend this method as proper usage?
Once again, thank you for your video and answer.
Elsewhere on the site
Skiing Baffin’s couloirs has been on my to do list ever since I saw Andrew McLean and Brad Barlage’s inspirational... Read more
As a long-standing name in the UK rockshoe market, Scarpa have a loyal following and many much-loved models. As a fan... Read more
WINTERFEST 2014 at Outside in Hathersage 6th and 7th December 2014 Outside's ever popular Winterfest event is back... Read more
Nick Livesey discovered the mountains of Snowdonia over a decade ago and finally moved there a year and a half ago, quitting a... Read more
A product review by James Turnbull. James Turnbull at Outside recently took the new Osprey Mutant 38 on a rigorous test in the... Read more