In reply to Rhys Jones:
> (In reply to Superchop75) ... (depending which summit you go to on Manaslu), but the overall experience of Manaslu would be much more enjoyable/ pleasant that Cho Oyu.
The summit is the highest point. There is only one, even on Manaslu, and the records are being adjusted accordingly. Most of the expeditions over the last decade did not go to the summit, they stopped short. People can go where they want and do whatever, it's just climbing, but once they make claims that are relatable to others then those claims will be judged within their community. That's just the way it is.
I don't know of any commercial expedition that has got anyone to the summit of Shishapangma, at least in the last decade or more. Plenty have reached the 'Central Summit' which is a lower bump on the ridge well west of the summit, and more than a few have been caught out lying about it. It's a great mountain, but not somewhere to go if you want a straightforward way to the summit of an 8000er. Nobody willingly stops 5m below, and 15m from, the summit of Everest - why do it on another 8000er?
Interesting to see Manaslu get so popular. For years it was deemed too objectively dangerous by all but a few climbers. Two friends have been missed by metres in serac/icefall in the last 10 years there. Once it became logistically and financially harder to take clients to Cho Oyu, the companies turned to Manaslu.