/ What GPS for running / biking
So thinking maybe get a proper GPS i can use for biking & running ect.
What do the great unwashed masses of UKC recommend?
A garmin forerunner and a bike mount. You can cycle with a running GPS, but you cannot run with a cycling one.
If you want decent navigation on it, I think the high end Edges are probably one of few choices.
If you just want pace/distance data during or after running/cycling then most Forerunners ( except possibly the 110) do this quite well.
The Forerunner 410(?) looks more like a watch, where the 205/305/310 are a big more bulky and less attractive looking. The 205 doesn't have a hrm, the others do I believe. The 310 is probably only worth it if you're into very long events.
Personally I use a 305, and in general I have no issues with it. I believe it is just about to be discontinued, so you may find a decent offer on it at the moment.
> A garmin forerunner and a bike mount. You can cycle with a running GPS, but you cannot run with a cycling one.
Not strictly true - I know a few people who run with Edges, though generally in a waist pack for post run/race data rather than real time stuff. Quite often I find running to a time pace rather than perceived effort can disrupt my mental state, so not having it at hand can actually be quite good.
Satmap's good for the bike but prob a bit too large for running with. Accuracy has always been good for me.
My other half hadn't taken hers off before filling the washing machine, and didn't notice it get knocked off - she ended up with a very clean but alas functionally useless gps!
Thanks for the advice all. I think I'll have a bit of a look into the forerunner gizmo.
That looks REALLY nice.Can I update any workouts done to a site like endomondo ect?
I wouldn't say they're "easily damaged" - they're not suitable for lengthy immersion but rain or an odd short dunking won't do them any harm. They do have an official level of water resistance, which I think is up to 30 minutes in a metre of water - they don't recommend you swim in them, for instance. I've had FR305, 405 and now 610 and none have ever been damaged by rain.
Although...the FR405 can be a pain in the arse in the rain - the clever "touch" bezel goes wonky and won't respond. I ditched mine and got a 610 which I can wear as a normal watch - and is absolutely fine in the rain as it uses good old fashioned buttons.
There's an upgrade for the 310XT (not sure of the number - 6-something) but again it's too big to wear every day. I wanted something I could use as a watch as I kept forgetting to put my "running watch" in my bag.
I've not used my 610 on my bike as I have an Edge 800 for cycling, which is top notch - touchscreen sat nav and every possible bike computer function you could imagine (and some you couldn't).
Good review here:
In fact Rainmaker's site has reviews for pretty much every sports GPS, so a good place to get some ideas.
On the bike mount issue someone else mentioned - likewise i found the supplied mount thing fiddly and a bit rubbish have found if i wrap a sock (work, brown) round the hadle bars i can use the standard wrist strap. No problems yet with rain
All the forerunners are fine to get wet, but only the 310XT and the new 910 are intended for swimming.
I should add that I have owed a 205 and now have a 610, both great, I just got sick of the bulk of the 205 on my wrist.
Don't care - my triathlon days are over - it took crawling out of the water in the last quarter of the field three times before I realised I'm just a born shit swimmer. To borrow a phrase - triathlon is just a good bike ride or run spoiled!
I think I got an email from Sweatyshop saying they had them? £350 without HRM anyway...
Another vote for the Garmin Forerunner 610 ( as long as you don't want maps to navigate by on the bike )
Great bit of kit, and as was previously mentioned small and smart enough to wear as a "normal" watch.
Another vote for the dcrainmaker reviews mentioned above - this guy goes into a LOT of detail !
Another vote for the Forerunners. I have the 310xt and love it. It is a bit over-specced for the running I do, but it will give me an OS grid ref which is nice. It used to be the only model that would do that but I don't know if the feature has been retained in the 910xt.
To whoever asked above, Garmin have their own website to which you can upload your data and look at it/compare it. You can also upload to a variety of 3rd party sites but I don't know specifically if Endomondo is one of them...
The 610 can give you an OS grid ref
The 310XT looks like it's got a great set of features, but it seems really bulky, is it? Do you notice it much? The 910XT seems smaller, but does it give the OS grid refs as well as the 310 does? All I want is a watch that does the following:
Pace (eg 10 min miles etc)
Gives you an OS grid ref
and has a good battery life and isn't too bulky.
The garmin devices all seem to output .gpx files, which you can load up pretty much anywhere. According to the endomondo website yes they do allow Garmin devices:
Battery life's a funny one - with GPS on they're all pretty limited, but turn it off and you can get days of battery life. As I said I use my 610 as my "everyday" watch, plus running 20-30 miles a week, and only charge it at weekends.
Another 310XT user here and I love it, great piece of kit. It does look bulky but you don't really notice it when it's on your wrist (even with the quick release kit which makes it a bit bigger again). As already mentioned it's one of the few running GPS devices which will give you an OS grid reference which is very useful. Being able to load courses to it is great too if you are cycling on a route you don't know, saves having to stop and look at the map all the time.
The altitude on my 305 is as accurate as a barometric one as far as I'm concerned and certainly accurate enough for nav in the mountains.
It's done about 3500 miles on my wrist now and I never really notice it so not bulky. It's still going strong and no signs of dieing. If it ever does die I'll probably go for something with a longer battery life and OS grid references which are the only things I'd change.
Something like the 310XT. But I can't really justify the price when my trusty 305 is still going like a trooper.
If you want both a barometric altimeter and a GPS built in to a watch then very limited choice.
Suunto have just announced a new model that has both of these for the first time ( I think ) called the AMBIT, not sure if it does OS grid ref, would guess so :-
Andy, the 910XT does have a barometric altimeter
> The 310XT looks like it's got a great set of features, but it seems really bulky, is it? Do you notice it much?
It is kinda bulky...I wouldn't use it as an everyday watch. I have scrawny little wrists and it looks really ridiculous on me, like one of those 80s calculator watches. The strap is good though, it sits securely on me and doesn't bug me when I am running.
> The 610 can give you an OS grid ref
Ok, I stand corrected :o) I don't think it had been released when I was researching these.
> The altitude on my 305 is as accurate as a barometric one as far as I'm concerned and certainly accurate enough for nav in the mountains.
Just trying to find something that combines the best features of both.
> If you want both a barometric altimeter and a GPS built in to a watch then very limited choice.
Don't mind if it's barometric or not, as long as it has a reasonably accurate altimeter function built into it then, that's fine.
The 910XT does have a barometric altimeter on it. Looking at DC Rainmakers review it does look smaller than the 310XT. Ticks all the boxes (and then some), just have to see what it's actually like on my wrist.
I would strongly agree with andy - altitude from satellites can be wildly inaccurate. If you need altitude to be accuraue, eg for navigating in mist, then I would say only rely on a barometric reading. If it's just a bit of fun ( ie how much did I climb on my run ) then the satellite based figure will give a reasonable indication.
That doesn't tally with my experience at all. My 305 is always within 10m altitude when I check it.
Barometric altimeters can be wildly inaccurate because of pressure changes so I wouldn't rely on them for navigation either.
> I would strongly agree with andy - altitude from satellites can be wildly inaccurate.
I would agree with this too...although the important bit is that is CAN be inaccurate, not that it always is. It depends a lot on your line of site to the hoirzon iirc, although my knowledge on this is hazy...
Garmin's software will retrospectively correct the GPS-derived elevation values based on the data from the maps when it overlays your route. If you want a reasonable assessment of your ascent/descent during your run for a training log or whatever, that works fine. I wouldn't rely on the elevation data from the GPS for navigation though.
Garmin Connect seems to over correct the ascent and descent data to consistently give a figure that is 20% low, I have tested this quite extensively and the good people on the FRA forums agree as well, but I don't know why.
> Garmin Connect seems to over correct the ascent and descent data to consistently give a figure that is 20% low, I have tested this quite extensively and the good people on the FRA forums agree as well, but I don't know why.
Interesting...I haven't had mine that long and most of my local routes are fairly flat so I hadn't noticed. I'll keep an eye out for that one!
I'm aware that neither a barometric or a GPS altimeter is 100% accurate. I've done with out a GPS or altimeter for the past 5/6 years fine, but it would be nice to have them as a useful aid to navigation, I won't be relying on either 100%.
To be honest, after reading DC Rainmakers review, I'm tempted by a 910XT. Might wait for the price to drop a little tho, as it's just out. Just want to see what it's like on the wrist so to speak.
> That doesn't tally with my experience at all. My 305 is always within 10m altitude when I check it.
I can only go on my personal experience. If the reception is good, it's fine. I have to say when I say check it, I mean look at the altitude at a known spot height. I've never had cause to check the total ascent/descent of a route.
Turbo trainer? Indoors presumably. GPS signal poor.
Coventry? Tall buildings. GPS signal poor.
The only time mine has ever gone awry was in Docklands on the London marathon.
So does the 205 have an in built HR monitor or do you have to get the chest strap thingy?
No issues for recording MTB routes as well as road routes ?
It is possible to get a grid reference out of the watch but it's not ideal for nav purposes. I find the GPS unit quite accurate at tracking distance and altitude both running and cycling. Only minor annoyance is having to stand still for about 40 secs after turning it on to get the first fix - if you're moving it takes about 3 - 4 mins. If you're a cyclist then the watch can also suck in data from cadence & speed sensors and be set up for multiple bikes.
I'm a great fan of the Foretrex series, I've got the 401. They are a wrist mounted GPS with a bikemount. Similar functions to Forerunners although doesn't do lap logs. I use it for running, biking and walking. The major advantage I find over the Foreunner was that it can display an OS Grid Ref whereas the forerunner doesn't. It also has barometric altimeter and can link with HRM or cycle cadence sensor.
I have checked with Suunto, the Ambit does not support OS Grid which is a big disappointment for a watch claiming to do it all. It actually only has Long/Lat, UTM and MGRS which are pretty useless in the UK, with the exception of uploading to google to see your route.
I've gone for the Garmin 310XT.
Came today, easy to set up, upload was simple, works a dream and doesn't look bulky or feel bulky.
Been out twice already - knackered now....
> Another vote for the Forerunners. I have the 310xt and love it. It is a bit over-specced for the running I do, but it will give me an OS grid ref which is nice. It used to be the only model that would do that but I don't know if the feature has been retained in the 910xt.
> To whoever asked above, Garmin have their own website to which you can upload your data and look at it/compare it. You can also upload to a variety of 3rd party sites but I don't know specifically if Endomondo is one of them...
Mode - system - settings - units - position
I agree. When I started running I couldn't decide what to get, so I got a Forerunner 110 and the basis that if it was a mistake, it wouldn't be a particularly expensive mistake. It lest me see how long I;ve been running, how fast I'm running, how hard I'm running (via HR) beeps every km, you can upload the track very easily and it's a reasonable every day watch. I use it for hiking, running and cycling and am very happy with it.
Quick update. I took a massive tumble wearing my 305 (tripped over a knee high fence, very painful, pride destroyed) and I thought it was ok. Scratched and beaten up but still working. What a trooper.
However, I now notice that after running in heavy rain the screen fills up with water. Still works though so it's definitely well built.
Having said that, I'm clearly going to need a new one sooner rather than later. Is there a newer version of the 310XT out yet?
Elsewhere on the site
Last year, Finn McCann wrote an article about climbing El Capitan with his terminally ill father Seamus, who had been... Read more
This streamlined, midweight thermal layer has an incredibly speedy moisture wicking ability and dries ultra fast if it gets... Read more
More than 20 years after first setting eyes on the peak and noting it as a potential objective, Mick Fowler, with Paul Ramsden,... Read more
The B.D.V. — short for Black Diamond Vertical — jacket and pants are Black Diamond’s most versatile climbing... Read more
October 21, 2014 – Textile Exchange, a global nonprofit dedicated to sustainability in the apparel and textile industry,... Read more