/ does cross-loading of belay biners really matter?
If the maximum braking force of my belay plate is 2 to 2.5 kN - typical for most modern plates, even those with teeth - why should I worry about cross-loading of my belay biner when the weakest that I use (Petzl Attache) is rated to 6 kN cross-loaded, and others are even stronger?
I accept that spinning of the biner can be mildly irritating, particularly when belaying with double ropes, but as I understand it a cross-loaded belay biner is still plenty strong enough for arresting a fall without breaking. So why the big song and dance about it?
Are people worrying about a problem that doesn't really exist? Or am I missing something?
Its more to do with the rope twisting and pressing against the gate - shearing the thin locking sleeve and releasing the bite of rope from the biner in a shock loading situation.
I was going to try and quote some maths, but i've realised that even if i do, the force exerted by a climber is unlikely to exceed 7kN. Despite what, why would you want to put yourself in the hands of something which is not as strong as it could be? The climber's frame of mind tends to be 'everything must be as strong as possible. If one thing sucks, how can i back it up?'
I dunno. Stop asking awkward questions.
pacman is talking about the braking force of a plate, not its breaking strength. A typical plate with a strong belayer will get up to about 4kN which is then the tension on the belay karabiner, as pacman says this is lower than the cross-loaded strength of a karabiner and heīs right in that it isnīt the biggest worry in the world.
> Its more to do with the rope twisting and pressing against the gate - shearing the thin locking sleeve and releasing the bite of rope from the biner in a shock loading situation.
> Cheers Adam
I don't understand how that could happen to be honest
Sorry might have got that wrong, could be the biner twisting against the harness.
Then quite obviously no, as I think (though I may be wrong here) that there are a grand recorded total of precisely zero failures of modern carabiners due to this while belaying. But....
I still really rate and like the BD Gridlock, soley because I like the fact that my device and biner are always perfectly lined up and working properly with no fiddling or adjusting required at inconvenient moments. So safer? Not really. Nicer? Yes, for me at least.
Really? So you're about to fall from three metres above the last bolt on a vertical sport climb, or from a metre or two above your well placed but small and weak micro-wire on a trad climb, and in both cases it wouldn't bother you whether you were belayed by 15 stones of pie eater with a grigri or an 8 stone waif with an ATC? Anyway, what's that got to do with the cross-loading of belay biners?
In reply to Madden:
I can't speak for other climbers but my own frame of mind tends to be 'everything must be as strong as it needs to be'. Will my gear hold if I fall on it? Will my belay hold if my mate falls? Two 'yes' answers and I'm happy.
In reply to jimtitt and neil the weak:
Thanks for reading properly and your replies.
Elsewhere on the site
Manchester Climbing Centre is showing Reel Rock’s Valley Uprising on Tuesday the 11th of November at... Read more
Last year, Finn McCann wrote an article about climbing El Capitan with his terminally ill father Seamus, who had been... Read more
Nuts, wires, stoppers, chocks, wedges, whatever you want to call them, have been around for a long time. Initially made from... Read more
A pack designed for year-round ascents. Super light, flexible, strippable and seasonally versatile you can rely on this perennial... Read more