In reply to stp:
There's a vast difference between "free space" and the number of files a root directory can hold
Back in the day, you only used to be able to store something like 512 files in the "root" folder of a Hard Disk, but if you moved the files into a sub-directory, it was 65,336 files per folder, and 512 folders
(Or something similar, I really can't be bothered to confirm that)
But the result was that you can completely "fill" a disk without filling it, as you fill the number of directory entries for individual files,
rather than in used space.
That's a lot less common now, with modern file systems, but there are still problems with enumerating (and sorting) the files in folders, and especially in the root folder, as they are now generally indexed and sorted - and with Windows, probably a database is generated with thumbnails of all images that are in there, too,
Which could take a very long time, and will thrash the disk,
People expect files to have icons (thumbnail images) of what the file is now. It's shite, and caters for idiots who have not learned to name their files sensibly -
- or rely on progammes to do that for them, as they cannot be bothered to pay any attention to details...
(Sorry, IT rant, just been trying to renew my Car insurance online, but I can't because it's too close to the point my current insurance expires (5 days in the future) and they are too shite to realise that they've just lost my business as a result of me having to explain that to them by phone)
did you do a
ls -al
in the root folder, by the way
?