In reply to Dr Toph:
> (In reply to Goucho)
> I do a fair bit of on-sight soloing at lower grades, and the mental and physical process is entirely different from headpointing. I would humbly venture that this is true soloing (pre-knowledge being itself a safety device), and so it would be much more interesting to talk about the differences between peoples onsight grades, led and solo.
> Similarly, when you are soloing, the ammount of available protection is meaningless to your ability to climb the route. So whether its an E25c lace-up or an exposed E55c makes little difference. You still have to climb 5c and success or failure depends on your ability to stick the crux move. So i would suggest that peoples on-sight technical grades, led vs solo would be more revealing still of how people approach soloing and the psychological effect of a rope
>
> (and no, sorry, grit highballs over mats dont count
Well put.
Mine would be:
hardest headpoint - E3 (usually 5c)
hardest onsight - E3 (5c)
(i.e. I tend to give up if I can't do the moves on something quickly so onsight and headpoint grades technically tend to be pretty similar. That doesn't mean I'd neccessarily have managed to onsight/ground-up the routes I'd headpointed if I'd tried them that way instead)
To me a proper solo is onsight - otherwise it's basically a headpoint. When falling isn't an option (i.e. nearly all the time) I'm only really happy soloing up to 4c, so will say VS for solo grade (though have done harder).
So that's 3 tech grades difference between lead and solo. The tech grade, level of commitment and type of rock/route is certainly what counts. A steady E1 5a can often be a much better choice than a burly VS 5a.