/ 35-40 litre pack
I currently have a osprey mutant that I used for a couple of weeks in the alps over the summer, and climbing crags in the UK etc. the bag is fine and does the job....but I don't like it.... there is too much going on, loads of straps/gadgets that could be simplified and made better! I brought the pack after reading some reviews and watching a couple of youtube videos, all seemed good, but now in my minute experience i've realised i need to simplify it.
So i've been browsing the web, and so far what i like the look of are Berghaus Capacitor 35, after reading the north ridge post, the north ridge ballistic 35 looks good, and originally had my eye on quechua bioassay 35 (now sold out and replaced with a simond), does anyone have either or, are they as simple as the look but still do the job, also robust etc. any recommendations?
planning a weekend walking in scotland in jan, more sport/trad climbing between, then a month or so in the alps in the summer, so bag need to serve the purpose for these needs, but mostly alps.
thanks for any help, and merry christmas!
and hear's a review :
Happy christmas ;-)
£35 for the Ballistic is very good value for money.
Have to agree. 45l fits the whole world in or if not full adjust the side compression straps to suit!
I remember when I went to GO and saw them. Very impressed and for some reason the 35 was more expensive than the 45!! Maybe because people deem 45 too big for climbing/walking??! I'm almost sure I paid 18quid for mine with one of their regular discounts, a genuine bargain and like said above, it you trash it, you don't mind as much!!
If the 40's too big then there's a 30 litre model as well, but that's only available in one back size.
I know what you mean about the Ospreys; they're all straps and flaps, floppy and soggy.
I found the Macpac Kakapo to be the perfect remedy. I think it will outlive me.
Yup, you've given the exact reason I didn't go for an Osprey; comfy, but straps and faffage all over the place. I can heartily recommend the Deuter Guide 35+. Some people claim it's heavy, but I find when it's on it's very comfortable and doesn't feel weighty. It can be stripped down if you want to, and the plus side of the slightly higher weight is the durability; I've had mine for two years now, use it pretty regularly and it hardly has a mark on it.
- Manufacturers selling rucsacs with a fairly basic construction suitable for moderate use and moderate loads.
- Manufacturers selling rucsacs with an enhanced construction suitable for heavy use and/or extreme loads.
Berghaus, North Ridge and Quechua fall into the former. POD, Macpac and Blue Ice fall firmly into the later with Crux and Osprey also tending in that direction. As an example, I completely destroyed a Berghaus Alpine Extreme within 2-3 years but I after ten years of equally hard use a POD Black Ice was still going strong.
If you are only every going to carry 'sensible' loads of no more than 10-12kg, then you shouldn't have any issues with something like the Ballistic, but regularly load it with 25kg, haul it up routes, climb granite chimneys with it etc. and it just won't last compared to something like the Blue Ice pack.
It is worth being aware of this. However, if you are spending £30 on a rucsac, rather than £100, having to replace it a lot sooner may not be something you will overly worry about.
> - Manufacturers selling rucsacs with a fairly basic construction suitable for moderate use and moderate loads.
> - Manufacturers selling rucsacs with an enhanced construction suitable for heavy use and/or extreme loads.
That is a slightly simplistic view of things. I presume you meant there are companies who make good bag and there are companies that make mediocre/bad bags. My Aiguille Alpine bags use very simple designs, are very hard wearing and carry heavy loads well.
> Berghaus, North Ridge and Quechua fall into the former. POD, Macpac and Blue Ice fall firmly into the later with Crux and Osprey also tending in that direction.
Have you used or even seen a Blue Ice bag in the flesh? They're well made out of top end materials, but the Warthog 26 is only a good bag for some 5'8'' or less as the back is too short. Even for someone who actually fits it, it is still going to be a poor choice for carry heavy loads, due to the inadequate Hip Belt.
Also I understand that the newer POD bags, like the Alpine 50 aren't anywhere near as durable as say a Black Ice.
I can strongly recommend these too bags as excellent rucksacks. The Cirrus is slightly smaller than the Mutant 38, whilst the Stratos is slightly bigger.
I don't know if i'd want to be carrying 25kg of gear anywhere to be honest.
Put 25kg in most outdoor packs and it would soon come apart regardless of cost. That's what bergens were designed for!!!!
Weird question for the stratos specific, does it have a small pocket or something similar for keys etc?
Only a minor thing, but definatley looks like the bag i'm after, if its a bag that will stand the test of time then i'm sure my student loan will take a small hit in january!
You can get simple rucsacs and highly-featured rucsacs in both price ranges. You can also get well-designed or inappropriate rucsacs whether they are cheap or expensive.
However, the one thing that the 'top end' mountaineering rucsacs have in common is that they are vastly OVER-engineered when it comes to the basic stitching and construction. That is not to say the are indestructible, just that more time and effort is expended to ensure it is not the stitching that fails first. [The POD Alpine sacs are a good example. The stitching is bombproof so it is the robustness (or lack of) of the lightweight fabrics that determine their overall durability.]
It does seems from some replies that other people don't perhaps abuse their rucsacs as much I do.
As such, there may be little for them to gain from spending more on a similar rucsac that has additional stitching and bar-tacking that they probably won't need anyway.
My favourite ever rucksack is Lowe Alpine's Crag Attack, now updated to be even better and somehow less than I paid five years ago!
Awesome for everything and have found Lowe's after-sales service to be extremely good in the past..!
Incidentally, if a bag has too many bells and whistles, you can always take a sharp blade to it...
I think the Aiguille stratos looks pretty tough, on the write ups it says a bag for life, would this be a true enough statement??
Maybe not a bag for life, but a big for a good ten to fifteen years of hard use.
> Weird question for the stratos specific, does it have a small pocket or something similar for keys etc?
The Stratos doesn't have an under lid pocked. It has a pretty large top pocket with a clip with car keys in it.
> Only a minor thing, but definatley looks like the bag i'm after, if its a bag that will stand the test of time then i'm sure my student loan will take a small hit in january!
That's a good decision. I'd recommend you ring Aiguille and order it over the phone rather than buying it online. Aiguille make all their stuff to order and you bag will arrive much quicker if you actually speak to them.
cilo 35 worksack if you can afford it.
I stopped using my Osprey for much the same reasons as the OP. I now have an OMM Jirishanca (35l). Much less faffage and you can remove most bits if you don't want/like them. Not cheap though.
Elsewhere on the site
Tonight's Friday Night Video features the Norwegian town of Rjukan, once believed to be the home of the world's tallest... Read more
Rock shoes stink – let’s face it. Boot Bananas are the perfect way to fight the funk and keep them fresh. They help... Read more
F ounded in 1993, Mountain Hardwear are a pretty young mountaineering clothing and equipment manufacturer but are also one of... Read more
With four photos in this week's top ten, and a UKC gallery of stunning images we thought it was time we had a chat with... Read more
Perhaps the perfect Xmas gift for the climber in your life... Wild Country's Crack School has two of the worlds best crack... Read more