/ Web Site
The site isn't finished yet, I've still got some text to do and the "slideshow" is currently running a bit faster than it will do evenually.
Plenty of info on there but I think it needs separating a bit more, all looks a bit plain at the moment. Maybe have tabs at the top of the page or something?
Hello, just started scrolling through.
It looks good, but I have some 'visitor experience' comments:
- there's some code appearing in black text from the second page onwards.
- could you put a menu at the top? It would the visitor to navigate more easily, rather than having to go through every page (which some visitors might not want to do). Perhaps you could divide the site into Kathmandu/Lukla/the mountains, or something like that.
- the 'next' on the final page doesn't take the visitor anywhere - even going 'home' would be good.
You might want to make the "next" link a bit more prominent. Its a bit lost at the moment.
Nice pics though.
> Hello, just started scrolling through.
That should be sorted now - working on the rest.
> You might want to make the "next" link a bit more prominent. Its a bit lost at the moment.
> Nice pics though.
Noted - thanks
> Plenty of info on there but I think it needs separating a bit more, all looks a bit plain at the moment. Maybe have tabs at the top of the page or something?
Working on it - thanks
The content looks great, but if I may be so bold, it looks a bit like a website from 15-20 years ago: just a splurge of information on a page. Dividing the content up into easily accessible tabs, and putting some thought into graphics and typography to help make the experience more user-friendly, will help things no end. It also renders poorly on mobile devices, which is a big deal as a large proportion of people now access the web mainly through their phone or tablet.
Great start though!
On that note, it might be worth MyPyrex investigating WordPress templates - a really easy way of ordering his information in a more up-to-date form.
The images are a little slow to load for me. Are they still too large? For example trek005.jpg is 2048 x 1536 pixels.
Yep, wordpress or blogger templates make the hard work of design so much easier. Also agree with the above poster about the images, they take too long to load because they are full resolution--which is not necessarily a bad thing to have as an option, but by default images should be at a smaller size to save bandwidth and improve loading time.
> On that note, it might be worth MyPyrex investigating WordPress templates - a really easy way of ordering his information in a more up-to-date form.
Good suggestion. It can also provide an easy answer to Pyrex's need for providing an email feedback without too much spam, as well as allowing moderated comments.
....well done getting this far though. A lot to learn at the start.
> The images are a little slow to load for me. Are they still too large? For example trek005.jpg is 2048 x 1536 pixels.
Just reduced it to 1024 x 1536. How does it look now?
Sort your image sizes out.
The picture of you (top left) takes ages to download, is eating up your bandwidth and needs reducing in size.
The actual image you have on your page is this one http://www.myxtrex.co.uk/digby5.jpg
It is 1400 x 1800 px and it is scaling in the browser to 200 x 250 px
Which means everyone that opens this page downloads a half a Meg (400kB) image in order to view a tiny picture which could be sent in 9kB! (I have just tested a resize in Gimp).
You need to resize it in an image manipulation program and save for web.
All of your images appear to have this major problem.
Just read your comment about the slide show, sorry, I have put that in the comment box at the end of the web page....should read opening thread first....dhhh. On the whole, I think its a great site, with loads of opportunity for expansion.
ps - You probably will not see how absolutely terribly slowly this page loads as your browser most likely has already caches the images.
Try a hard refresh (Ctrl-F5) to see what a monster download you have created.
As others have said, some good information on your pages, just lost in a poor design that looks very dated. However I gather from other posts that you are hand-writing your html code from scratch and there is a lot to learn.
Can I start by asking what is the aim of the site, who is it for and what do you expect them (the users) to get from the site. Sites need to be designed for the intended audience, their expectations and also the devices that they are likely to be using to view the site upon.
If your site is simply a vehicle for you to learn html yourself then no problem, you can develop it as you go along. If however yor site has a real aim or focus then you need to get the design / layout / format of it right from the start.
If you want to continue hand coding then you need to learn CSS (Cascading Style Sheets), these will enable you to separate your design from the content, making changes easier to perform.
If you want an effective website building quickly then you need to consider using a Content Management Tool, Wordpress, CMS made simple or something like that - these however require installing on some sevrers but often come pre-installed with some web hosts. Also they require learning, but easier than learning html from scratch.
I'm happy to give you ideas, things to look into if you like.
Hope this helps.
i think you should start using CSS- you could transform the look of your site with a few lines of code..
Ouch--just made the mistake of viewing the page over 3G on my phone, and it's eaten up quite a few megabytes!
> Just reduced it to 1024 x 1536. How does it look now?
2,048px × 1,536px (scaled to 400px × 300px)
Why would you change it to 1024 x 1536 px anyway when you have set it to display at 400 x 300 px?
It's over a Meg! The internet slows down each time this page is loaded and they have to switch on auxillary nuclear power plants.
Change the image size (In an image manipulation program) to the size that you want to display it (400 x 300 px). Save it for web - This will select a suitable compression quality level.
I have just made a 400 x 300 px version of your 1MEg file and it is 53.3kB.
Just timed it on my iPad, we've a 5mb connection, and each page takes around 25 seconds to load. As others have said, it's mainly due to your images not being optimised for the web and basically being too big in file size.
Generally it's a bit plain looking but not a bad start, at least you don't have auto-loading video.
I'd make the home page much lighter in content, it should have just enough to pull the visitor in and provide links to the interesting parts of the site. Typically home pages should load in a second or two, users won't wait much longer than that.. The content's all a bit linear at the moment.
Navigation: there's no distinguishing between internal links to other pages on the site and external sites. You can style these up with CSS, preferably in an external stylesheet. Have links at the top of each page, perhaps as a horizontal list, as well as at the bottom - this is being kind to your visitors.
I'm sure there's more ...
Use some basic CSS + JQuery UI and it will look about 10000000% better
Couple of minor issues:
Position of Next link is too low so a slight miss click is likely to mean hitting the icon in the Task Bar at bottom of screen.
Needs a Home button so you can always jump back to the begining.
Personnally I am not keen on Deep Blue backgrounds and Yellow text, it is very tiring on the eyes and detracts somewhat from the evocative photos. If background could be a lot lighter / subtler and text plain / dark.
But welcome back.
As others have said, the linear structure is unhelpful, the colour scheme is unpleasant and the 'Next' button on the first page is so well hidden that I'd never have noticed it unless I knew from others' comments that there were more pages to find. Some of the content is quite interesting though.
Elsewhere on the site
Nuts, wires, stoppers, chocks, wedges, whatever you want to call them, have been around for a long time. Initially made from... Read more
From a personal point of view, photographing the night sky is one of the most difficult, frustrating yet ultimately rewarding... Read more
The Grivel A&D Ascender & Descender is brand new for Autumn 2014 and incorporates a revolutionary and innovative patented... Read more
Pete Whittaker has flashed the 32 pitch route Freerider 5.12d on El Capitan in Yosemite Valley over three days,... Read more
This survey is being conducted by the Outdoor Industries Association in order to find out more about how and why people... Read more