/ No Nuclear Dump in the Lake District
Please sign the petition if you are so inclined:
For more information see:
Also, wont this stop any kind of city being built there in the future
Which new power station?
One threat is the possible construction of scores of electricity pylons to connect the new Moorside nuclear power station, to be built near Sellafield, and wind turbines in the Irish Sea, to the national grid. Possible routes include scything across the Lake District National Park south towards Morecambe Bay, with conservationists urging that the cables are instead buried. A National Grid spokesman said that the preferred corridors would not be identified until the spring
That is irrelevant to the subject of the repository for waste. The sites and logistics for the new nuclear sites is a separate issue. I don't think anyone wants to see the loss of thousands of jobs in Cumbria based on scaremongering.
Hey up Philip, how would you like a nuclear dump putting underneath your home?
What's that? You don't fancy it?
Well there's a surprise.
Guess all you like, you're rather ill-informed.
Buried would be better than pylons but I haven't had time to read about the whole thing.
I think you'll struggle to identify the exact foreign waste, but the proportion relating to overseas waste is due to return - some already has. I'm not aware this is a point of contention.
Presumably you enjoy having the electricity to switch on your computer and type that post. If you want to continue having it you need to accept that nuclear energy is part of all our futures. The waste has to go somewhere; wishing it away will do no-one any good.
> Presumably you enjoy having the electricity to switch on your computer and type that post. If you want to continue having it you need to accept that nuclear energy is part of all our futures.
you won't be needing it in our lifetimes..
Rather a nuclear repository or "dump" as you prefer to call it than a scaremongering dump on the forums every other day.......
In my opinion economically, environmentally and ethically the best place to put our nuclear waste is in a deep underground repository. Its the only place we can expect long term stability & security, allowing 10,000 to 100,000 years (depending on reprocessing) without disturbance for the waste to become below the radioactivity of the Uranium ore that it came from. Most of the rock in the lake district is around 500 million years old and can be expected to last several million more.
I believe the site should be chosen primarily on geographic suitability, but unfortunately this is not practical as local politics gets in the way of every attempt outside of a majority nuclear employed zone. The only other volunteering has been of another current nuclear site at dungeoness, where they stand to lose lots of jobs when the power station closes. Even though the local council supports this it was strongly condemned by the wider local government, who are determined to prevent it. As a result of this type of unfortunate situation if volunteerism isn't used then there stands virtually no chance of a repository being built in Britain at all.
One key point about a repository which to some extent reduces the importance of the rock is its potential for waste recovery if things start to leak long before they should. Even if it is just used as another form of (relatively) infinite storage, anything leaking 500m underground is much better than it leaking on the surface!! If it is the best we can agree on then it is the best option, because we need a repository.
Don't build one - This is the Scottish governments stance, to ban future underground storage for their waste, which is both unhelpful and shortsighted. How to they plan on keeping surface storage both secure and maintained safely for the next 10,000-100,000 years? Leave it to the kids to work out, eh?
Dump in deep ocean - ethically questionable, environmentally questionable (things live down there), potentially fairly secure, probable low future risk to humans, banned by treaty.
Put in space or sun - can you promise that rocket won't blow up before space???
Reprocess waste, reuse the 97% from reprocessing for energy generation, then potentially burn up or use the remaining 3% in advanced reactors or in future transmutation technologies. Prudently keep waste in a repository in the meantime until such action is taken or just store the small (3%) amount of 10,000 year waste. Or don't and leave it on the surface as we all argue about it!
I've not seen the proposals for the siting of the repository -- though from my understanding things are very much at a feasibility and investigation stage. I would be highly surprised if it were proposed for the repository to be sited within the most sensitive parts of the National Park - particularly up in the Ennerdale valley itself.
It is an undeniable fact have a considerable quantity of both high and low level waste in the UK - much of which will be radioactive for many hundreds of years. The existing storage and reprocessing facilities at Sellafield and elsewhere in the UK have a limited life. The Scandinavians have demonstrated that deep underground storage of nuclear waste in a geologically stable environment is viable, and whilst I would love to see such a repository constructed in the leafy 'home' counties it aint gonna happen.
When so much of the waste is already situated in Cumbria, and if the geology is proven to be viable then why not construct a repository in the county. From my own involvement with the nuclear construction industry I know that this is something that has been talked about for over 30 years yet nothing has been done about it.
People need to 'get real' with this issue ( and about the fact that we almost certainly need more nuclear power generation to make up for the shortfall in energy supply that's likely to occur in 10-15 years time due to current generating capacity reaching the end of its working life).
Doing nothing is not an option -- but as there are not enough votes in Cumbria to be won or lost either way that will influence the outcome of future general elections, politicians will keep ducking the issue and leave the subsequent mess for future generations to sort out!
OOOOh I do like a good rant now and again!
Elsewhere on the site
Last year, Finn McCann wrote an article about climbing El Capitan with his terminally ill father Seamus, who had been... Read more
Manchester Climbing Centre is showing Reel Rock’s Valley Uprising on Tuesday the 11th of November at... Read more
Nuts, wires, stoppers, chocks, wedges, whatever you want to call them, have been around for a long time. Initially made from... Read more
A pack designed for year-round ascents. Super light, flexible, strippable and seasonally versatile you can rely on this perennial... Read more
Pete Whittaker has flashed the 32 pitch route Freerider 5.12d on El Capitan in Yosemite Valley over three days,... Read more