/ Abseiling Knots
I have recently seen examples, on V-threads and fixed gear, of this knot being used to join the ends of abseil cord, (not tape), as opposed to the more traditional double fishermans knot.
Is there a consensus of opinion on this as to whether it's safe or not, is it listed as a valid technique in any instruction books? Or has it evolved from people using it to join abseil ropes together?
Unlike with abseil ropes, thinner cord doesn't have vast safe margins in terms of strength and I am fairly sure that loops tied with a double fisherman's will be marginally stronger than those tied with an overhand.
As such, I'd say an overhand would be a rather poor choice for 4mm or 5mm cord but absolutely fine (when neatly tied c/w tails) for 7mm+ cord. However, given that 4mm and 5mm cord are a poor choice for fixed gear in the first place and should be treated with suspicion regardless of knots, I don't think there is a massive issue.
Thanks for the advice guys.
I have been tying the double overhand knot ever since I changed over from a double fishermans. As for thinner cord at rap points, I won't abseil off anything less than 6mm, preferably 7mm. If I find thin tat then I replace it, or add my own larger diameter cord.
Dead common on the continent, mainly because hanging on and fiddling a thread through itīs a bit hard to actually tie a double fishermans one handed.
If you're worried about the knot rolling why not leave a long tail and tie the ends of the rope together?
Ummmm GaryK NOW you start asking about knots....... Wish I could remember who was tying the ropes together a few years ago !!
It isn't a question of safe or not. There's a spectrum of safety concerns, with greater strength and security being balanced by various other specific usage considerations.
If, as Jim mentions, you are hanging on with one hand and need to tie a knot, then it goes without saying that a knot you can't tie this way isn't going to be of any use, and so the overhand, whatever its deficits may be, is the only game in town.
If the resistance to pulling a rappel caused by knot drag is important, and/or if concern about the knot actually hanging up and preventing rappel retrieval is a problem, then the overhand knot has been tested to excel in reducing both these concerns, and hence its broad acceptance for joining rappel ropes. A second feature of the overhand knot is that it is relatively easy to untie after loading.
On the other hand, viewed out of any specific contexts, the overhand isn't a good joining knot. It rolls under loading, with cyclical loading being especially worrisome, and there are stronger alternatives that are completely stable.
My take is that if you have two hands and aren't in a desperate rush, then rappel slings, whether tape or cord, should be joined with a double fisherman's. None of the advantages of the overhand apply to knots that aren't being dragged down the rock, the slings are not destined to be untied after use, and so it is hard to see any good argument for using an otherwise inferior joining knot for that purpose.
>and so it is hard to see any good argument for using an otherwise inferior joining knot for that purpose.
Does get you to the pub about 60 seconds earlier though!
Right. I did make allowances for those in a "desperate rush."
i regularly abseil off v-threads tied with double overhands in 5mm cord.
Elsewhere on the site
Over the years I've been asked many times about work as a Rope Access technician, often by Instructors and Guides working for... Read more