/ Sensible taxation - what would you introduce?
I'd do away with 'road tax'. Working from an average mileage of 1000 miles per month, the equivilant duty would then be placed on fuel. Yes, fuel would go up <again!> but no more road tax. A fleet car doing doing 35k per annum will pay more in duty than the family of 2.4 children doing 12k. Those that use the roads the most, pay the most. What of the staff involved in admin of the discs then? Well they'd still have a job as there would need to be an exemption system in place for 'other' pertol/diesel users. A photo ID would be required on a sort of swipe card and each time you purchased a gallon of petrol for your boat/mower/stove etc the card would be swiped at the petrol station and you'd get the fuel at a slightly reduced rate up until your annual exemption allowance was reached. Full price after that.
Good food will attract a reduced rate of VAT, shit food gets the highest to subsidise the other side. Fruit and veg, fresh cuts of meat, pasta, rice etc all falling in the lower VAT bracket, McDonalds, KFC, Red bull and some ready meals attracting the highest along with salty and sugary snacks. The aims being to encourage better, healthier eating and reduction of obesity.
Alcohol sold in shops for consumption at home would carry a higher tax than alcohol sold in pubs. The off licence subsidising the pub then. Bit of a contradiction here as I'm trying to get folk to eat better but at the same time encouraging them to go to the pub! Pubs are dying on their feet though and we need to keep the industry afloat purely from an income point of view. A drinker is a drinker right?
It's just for fun and may never work in the real world but what taxation schemes would you devise?
From a business point of view I would do away with the tremendously complicated environmental taxes which require business to expend resource on managing the data and Government to employ people to manage compliance. I'd replace the lot with direct taxes on energy - universal, fair and simple to collect.
I'd also scrap the 'Aggregates Levy' imposed on each tonne of material quarried. It costs a bomb to administer and is mainly paid for by Government as they are the largest customer of new construction. Utterly self-defeating.
We have far too many taxes in the UK. The same amount of tax could be raised much more simply and at less cost.
Drop VAT to 10% while dropping VAT threshold for small businesses to £35K
Abolish all taxes except income tax and "vice taxes" where there is a motivation other than income.
I agree with your view on road tax, the only problem being when alternative fuels become the norm. That's why road pricing needs to be investigated long-term.
I'd abolish VAT entirely, it's a nasty, regressive tax, and a right administrative pain.
OK, under my scheme you could well end up with a base rate of income tax well over 50%, but at least you'd be being honest about it.
What you have a 50% tax on savings interest?
Although this thing has been around since the eighteenth century it became a particular delight for Gordon Brown to play to his own constituency by hammering the growth regions.
> Good food will attract a reduced rate of VAT, shit food gets the highest to subsidise the other side. Fruit and veg, fresh cuts of meat, pasta, rice etc all falling in the lower VAT bracket, McDonalds, KFC, Red bull and some ready meals attracting the highest along with salty and sugary snacks.
This is already the case. Fresh (essential) foods have 0% VAT. Luxury goods and eat in foods have VAT. I think even if takeaway food were taxed at 20%, people would still eat it, and the folks who tend to live on it are those who can least afford it. You will simply take away even more money from those who have least to give.
and cake is clearly essential :)
Which would mean a lot of wealthy people paying no tax unless you changed how income tax was defined but hen it wouldn't be income tax?
I'd get rid of NI and just add it to imcome tax which is what it is anyway?
Calculate the income from all current taxes except vice taxes. Increase income tax so it brings in that income. Abolish the other taxes.
> I think even if takeaway food were taxed at 20%, people would still eat it
>and the folks who tend to live on it are those who can least afford it. You will simply take away even more money from those who have least to give.
This is hard but nessesary - hard up? buy some VAT free food and choose to forego fast food
either way though we need to address VAT on home energy, food is essencial but we have to pay VAT on the gas to cook it? Any ideas on that one?
VAT is a nasty, complex, regressive and unfair tax. Just get rid of it, IMO.
I've never quite understood why the left-wing EU loves it.
except taxi drivers
Therefore my suggestion would be to abolish income tax and put VAT up.
Far more efficient for tax collecting. and you the consumer can decide what you want to pay in tax from your purchases.
For the purposes of 'fair' (in my eyes) taxes I would change the system so that No VAT on essentials which is largely the case but would have someone look at what is essential. Perhaps all famillies can have exemption on one computer per two years for example. I would still like luxury goods to be taxed for this i am thinking new cars for example.
For income tax I would instigate a complete change in all the laws, I would have an assessment done on how much tax is paid by the average worker in this country on the average wage, for arguments sake 22k. This would then be calculated as a percentage of their earnings and everyone who earned over that would have ot be able to prove that they were paying at least that percentage of their wage. This would include national insurance which would be changed to simply be part of the tax. Income would be upon all salaries, dividends, pensions, interest payments and the many other things i do not know about that people use to avoid tax.
Underpinning this would be a 'principle' that people must pay or this is considered illegal and some form of restitution by teh country can be obtained.
I would use some of the money this generates to pay to police it. I wonder how the economy would look if everyone earning over 22k payed a quarter of their salary to the government.
a) National Insurance.
b) Income Tax below £20K and above £100K make it 40% (20K to 100K it would be 15%)
c) Fuel Duty
d) Road Tax
And then replace it all with more VAT, such that anything built with 90% UK content got 5% Vat, anything with 90% european content got 20% Vat. and anything from USA or China got 50% VAT
But why are you worried about these people. They are a tiny minority. Why not go after the super rich, or tax people with excessively large houses in the countryside to name but a few.
The idea that you will create a healthy nation by taxing high fat foods is laughable.
"May need ammending to be a percentage of income earned over taxable threshold"
Yes, it would, otherwise you get the same silly situation as you do with Stamp Duty of it causing unnatural steps in salaries, e.g. if you had the split at £25K someone earning £24,999 would get more take home than someone earning £25,001, which is silly.
That sort of tax is more about covering costs to society. Similar to alcohol tax, which should cover the cost of policing and health spending relating directly to its consumption.
"And then replace it all with more VAT, such that anything built with 90% UK content got 5% Vat, anything with 90% european content got 20% Vat. and anything from USA or China got 50% VAT"
That would be all very well if you could actually buy, e.g., UK made consumer electronics. As you can't, that's just silly protectionism which will just reduce peoples' quality of life for no good reason.
I'm under no illusion of that! The only reason i'd introduce that is simply to answer the knockers. Every tax that is introduced the 'other side' argues 'if you are taxing that then what about such and such?' I'd be able to say on my budget day press conference that shitty food will now have a higher levey. If you want to eat shit food you'll a premium. If you want to eat well you'll be rewarded by less VAT. If you want to eat well and get cheaper food but don't know how, we'll help.
Its real tough isn't it, whatever form of taxation you come up with, there will be a creditable argument against it
True. But if you discriminate against the fatties, you also end up putting all the takeaway shop owners out of business which is probably worse on the grand scale of things. Why not just charge people to use the NHS? :-)
> True. But if you discriminate against the fatties, you also end up putting all the takeaway shop owners out of business which is probably worse on the grand scale of things. Why not just charge people to use the NHS? :-)
Its no more descrimination that short, skinny folk who get their adult clothes in kids sizes and avoid VAT. Descrimination again the fatties if they HAD to have a donner for dinner and a big tasty meal for tea but they dont have to do they, they could cook themselves some chicken and pasta ;-)
But based on that argument, surely all outdoor activities should be heavily taxed? I am sure there are more severe outdoor related injuries than from those who choose to spend their Saturday afternoons at the Trafford Centre? And what about the new privatised mountain rescue? Surely that should be axed to save money?
Compulsory summit permits for mount Tryfan. Its the only way
> c) Fuel Duty
> d) Road Tax
So that the cost of having 33 million vehicles on the road is borne by people who aren't driving?
The existence of road vehicles, particularly those carrying freight, benefits pretty much everyone.
There could also be an agrument for taxing curb weight too. I'm pretty sure that over an extended period of time a BMW X5 wears roads a bit more than my 1.4 Astra.
We need to find a way of taxing caravans too ;-)
Depends if your tracking is out or not! :-)
Cars are not "effectively toys", don't be silly. People use cars for all sorts of important travel purposes. If they went away tomorrow, the railway wouldn't be able to cope (for instance).
The long-term solution to that problem is lifestyle and work changes, e.g more homeworking.
It is surprising what axle weight can do. In the McNulty report it was found that the class 185 units on the Morecambe branch line tripled the track maintence after these units replaced the Class 153 units. It went from 1m PA to 3m PA and it was down to the heavier weight. Railways i know but there we go. Anyway, thats another thread :-)
Sureley the "fatties" are good for the environment as they act as quite effective carbon stores.
Isn't there a danger in using green taxes to subsidise their greens?
Thats the touble though, the only greens a lot of fatties eat are mint aeros
You are so right; I have to drive to the dry cleaners which is three quarters of a mile away because the railway can't cope. Somebody did mention something called "walking" but I couldn't get the hang of it.
Cars are used for local journeys when they needn't be, I'll give you. But the way the economy is at the moment people aren't just making local journeys. The commute to work for many people is longer than ever.
Yes, a single person living in rented accommodation can move closer to work each time, and some are quite sanctimonious about it. But if you've got a family to consider (and two jobs in two different places) it's not all that simple at all.
Yes the axle weight relates to road damage as roughly a power of 4. So yes that x5 does roughly 2.5 time the damage of your astra, but that's nothing compared to the 4500 times of a 44 ton lorry!
But if you use this system your road tax would be virtually nothing but the goods in the shops would cost a fortune to deliver and be much more expensive to buy.
PS even the most efficient x5 pays £260 vehicle duty compared to your £105 so pretty much already they're paying for the extra damage they do.....
> I've never quite understood why the left-wing EU loves it.
Why does the right-wing USA also love it?
Bin all the stealth and not so stealth tax on buisiness and alow us to make some money, the more we make the more we can grow and both employ more people and pay more direct taxation.
The right-wing USA has sales tax, which is different from VAT (far less complicated) and usually far lower (tends to be around 8% or less).
I'd introduce a flat rate of tax - say 25% and abolish NI/INCOME TAX
How can it be right that you pay MORE tax the harder you work/earn!
Worked quite well in pre banking crisis Baltic countries!
I'd also make all benefits in the form of a food stamps/electric tokens etc.
> I'd also make all benefits in the form of a food stamps/electric tokens etc.
I thought that way, but listening to this may give you a different perspective http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2013/04/12/177063399/episode-451-why-some-people-love-tax-day
Elsewhere on the site
Pete Whittaker has flashed the 32 pitch route Freerider 5.12d on El Capitan in Yosemite Valley over three days,... Read more
Last year, Finn McCann wrote an article about climbing El Capitan with his terminally ill father Seamus, who had been... Read more
Aiming at designing and producing the best belay glasses to protect climbers’ necks, Y&Y focuses on every detail to... Read more
Manchester Climbing Centre is showing Reel Rock’s Valley Uprising on Tuesday the 11th of November at... Read more