In reply to Bruce Hooker:
> (In reply to Saor Alba)
>
> [...]
>
> Who would take seriously such "facts" if they were "laid out" by the present British government which is obviously against a break up of the country it was elected to defend? The very notion is illogical. ...
> PS. Before I'm accused of dissing the Scots, I have absolutely no doubt that Scotland could function as an independent country, what I doubt is whether this is the best solution.
Well said Bruce, I'm a Scot but I did not vote the Nats in. , but I am now in the position, that there is a 'no win ' vote, with no backup plan like Devo Max.
I can't get sensible answers to anything, everything said by the UK government is totally biased, and the Nats just call it scaremongering, but no one answers the questions.
If I vote yes, I take a stab in the dark, and I might have to guess it will work after a fashion,( or crash disastrously like our unionist friends assert. )
Or I vote no, and I am equally in the dark of what the Tories will do when they have the upper hand and can call all the shots? ' the rebellious Scots to crush'
As I have pointed out before,at least one Tory MP has broken the silence, and called for the Scots budgets to be cut when they vote no.
She was not supposed to say that( until after the vote! )
So who was it that changed their vote, to let the Nats in , knowing that they will hold a referendum?
Not me, but I know at least one Tory who admitted, that HE voted SNP to try and keep labour out. So was there really a groundswell of support for independence leading scots to vote SNP in , or was this whole thing just caused by a miscalculation by Tory supporters who knew voting Tory in Scotland is like PITW?
So my question is , did the Tories in Scotland vote SNP and tip the balance and let SNP in, or if not , how did the SNP get in?