/ 45-50l Alpine rucksack
http://www.gooutdoors.co.uk/deuter-guide-45-plus-rucksack-p269562 - Quite heavy but if it's really comfy then the extra weight may be worth it.
http://www.gooutdoors.co.uk/exos-46-m-p178571 - Has one of the suspension systems on the back, I've not really used any bags with this on before, I've been told that bags with these on are often optimistic with the quoted volumes.
http://www.cotswoldoutdoor.com/osprey-talon-ii-44-rucksack-62110543 - The smaller one is the mutts nuts so I'd imagine this is pretty good as well.
With price matching and bmc discounts I can get all of these to roughly the same price.
I'm happy to look at other options as well if there's anything which I've missed or that have a very similar fit to a talon. Which of these would I be best off going with?
i did the conville course last year with a deuter 32l sack, i reckon its big for a 32l but that was plenty big enough, i could just about squeeze bivvi kit into it too, so i would say you dont absolutely need one.
if youre gonna get one though the deuter packs are great and i think the back system on the exos isnt the best for alpine stuff.
I'd suggest thinking long-term: a rucksack should last you a good number of years, so it's well worth getting something that will do all (or most) of what you anticipate you are likely to require from a rucksack over the next few years.
So, if you envisage carrying bivvy gear at some stage - but not necessarily this year - buy a sack that will enable you to do that. Despite what some more macho threads and posts on UKC might suggest, a sac under 45l is unlikely to be suitable.
Again, because a sack should last you for years, it is better to pay more now than to end up having to pay twice at some later date because you have bought a less good quality one now. In addition to quality of fabrics and design, I'd also be aiming for simplicity of design. Finally, I'd suggest heading to your local independent climbing shop and asking their advice.
As long as you are staying in huts then your current sac will be fine. The larger rucksack will only encourage you to take more than you need. Fast and light is your principle and for good reasons.
The Talon 44 has a tubular aluminium frame supporting the back that I found very uncomfortable when I tried to store my axe down the back of my sack. It's also made of very lightweight material, and the thin straps and buckles are a real pain to use with gloved hands. If you fancy an Osprey, the Mutant 38 or Variant 37 might be better bets.
I like the Talon for summer walking, but have gone back to my Lowe Alpine Alpine Attack 45 for winter climbing and cragging use - mine is about 15 years old now, tough as old boots and still in remarkably good nick given the hammering it's taken over the years.
If anyone's interested in taking a "vintage" MacPac Pursuit rucksack (old fashioned one in indestructable material without a metal frame so weighs peanuts let me) let me know.
The Mrs' has been nagging me to have a clear out for ages.
£20 if you can pick it up in Leeds or surrounding area!
From what people have said it looks as though I may well be able to get by with my current bag for now, thinking about it I'll probably not be taking a full rack anyway which will massively cut down on the size and and someone else will carry the rope so if I'm relatively careful with packing it should not be a real issue. Ice axe and helmet were always going to go on the outside.
Thanks for the advice everyone.
and i've got a larger aiguille 40L pack for more serious stuff.
Talon 33 will be fine for the conville, the problem with large packs is you take too much stuff then you've got to carry it !
if i was shelling out for a new 45L id be looking at the latest montane and MHW offerings.
I have a maybe 3 year old pursuit. Frame is removable, most of the time I don't use the frame, use the pack every weekend though. Really good size at 55l for my one pack does all role. Really like that the parts against your shoulders back hips aren't faced with delicate material like a lot of packs. Material for the pack body is still plenty solid. Not as stiff as my 12ish year old Macpac though.
Is heavy though. Cilogear dyneema packs sure look interesting.
I'm a big fan of the Mountain Hardwear SummitRocket 40. I find that using it on tours where you sleep in huts it's on the large side, but it's just big enough for bivy gear or a small tent.
size 2 I think.
Have used AK47, good but broken 2 of them as stitching failed.
Have a black ice which is excellent quite big in size 3. Used for multi day routes has worn extremely well.
Tore a.hole in a go lite putting My boots in.....
Elsewhere on the site
The release of Peter Jackson's new film The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies on 12th December may not appear to link to... Read more
F ounded in 1993, Mountain Hardwear are a pretty young mountaineering clothing and equipment manufacturer but are also one of... Read more
Perhaps the perfect Xmas gift for the climber in your life... Wild Country's Crack School has two of the worlds best crack... Read more
PowerFingers is a simple, easy to use product which is incredibly effective for Climbers who require finger strength and... Read more
Will Sim and Andy Inglis have made the second ascent of VIII,9 on Ben Nevis, followed by Will making a rare... Read more