In reply to rug:
No, sorry for any confusion, I tried a pair of the Bejaggles (daft name) at the wall last night. They seemed very good, looked fine, and seemed quite sturdy, image well night perfect. The only downside is that the owner said he had only had them a short while and somehow one of the prisms had been chipped slightly. I didn't notice any effect from that but it seemed to run contrary to their apparent sturdiness (which in a sense makes me worry even more about the CU's).
I would have thought, however, the Bejaggles would be slower getting to me - from the US - whereas the CU's seem to have a UK distributor.
I completely agree that £10 is nothing really, as I said. Hence why I would just like to hear the thoughts of anyone who's tried both in particular.
I've not seen the CU's in action at all. They look fairly cool, as these things go, quite minimalist. Which is partly what worries me - they look a little vulnerable whereas the Bejaggles look a bit more sturdy without looking to nerdy - ooh that rhymes
Also the Bejaggles are supposed to have a wider field of view.
Anyway, just repeating myself here. I think the reason there are so few reviews of Bejaggles is that they are fairly new on the market (and only distributed in the US).
As you say, I suspect it's going to come down to taking a punt at one or t'other.