In reply to maria85:
> (In reply to jon) The large groups of Israelis seems (from the ones I've spoken to) to be due to the fact that they still have compulsory military service, for which they are paid. So they leave the army 2 years later, tons of cash, no job to go to, still young, and all go travelling. This also explains why the groups are predominantly male.
Yeh, that's about it, from what I know. In 2011 in Peru was the same, though Peru and Bolivia have always been popular with young Israelis. There used to be visa issues years ago for them that made some countries more accessible than others, but this may have changed. Cusco is so crowded they mostly blend in, but en route to Macchu Pichu etc they dominated the buses by a factor of four or five, made even more notable by how they move together, stay together, talk and socialise together etc. I think the more people do it, the more it becomes a cultural thing at home to have 'done it' so it feeds on itself. I was talking about this with a couple of Israeli walkers I met in NZ last year, who were uncharacteristically there and not in Bolivia or Nepal.
Like any big mob of youths they could be quite intimidating en masse and get a bit rowdy etc, but overall I've found them friendly, good kids and relatively competent outdoors. Better behaved, less drunk and violent than plenty of British or Australian youngsters. I suppose my main complaint, if I had to look for one, is they're so tight-arsed cheap they really screw the locals for every little cent, so I can understand why they're not so popular in some places. I have seen them be quite rude to lodge owners in Nepal etc but I've seen all nationalities be rude to locals in various ways, so in that regard they're not necessarily notable.
I know I'm talking about 'them' like they're another species and that's a bit ugly, but it's more that they really are quite distinctive on the travel circuit by being all together in such large numbers, in certain places and so homogenous.