In reply to UKC News: A bit off on a tangent.
Should the Mountain Training UK and the BMG also put their assessors through a proper course on how to assess people such as courses in Front line assessing.
On talking to some ex and aspirant guides in the last few years the assessment procedure seemed to be a bit roping with different assessors expecting different outcomes from what the candidate was trained in. The aspirant guide had been taught more than one way of carrying out a task by different guides providing the training and then finding that the assessor didn't like the way it was being done even though the outcome was just as safe as the way the assessor was looking for.
At times there also appeared to be personality clashes between assessors and aspirant guides which if a proper assessment was being carried out based on observations and expected outcomes already identified in a rigorous formal process, the personality issues shouldn't have any baring in the pass or fail of the candidate.
The above observations have just been based on a few conversations with a few former aspirant guides who have gone elsewhere for work. But they did highlight that the assessors had no qualifications in assessing other than experience as guides which didn't necessarily make a guide a good assessor.
This probably doesn't reflect the majority of situations but personalities do often get in the way of climbing and the organisations need to find a way of removing this from the assessment process.
I used to provide training in Multimedia for national qualifications and would have been unable to assess them without a First Line Assessors award.
Just a though!