I've noticed recently a number of comments about the amount of work going into photos to enhance them. Now in the past people used dark rooms to improve the picture taken. My bet though is that virtually all the photos in the historical section of UKC have not been worked on and may be seen as all the better for it.
So what do you think? Is there a case for 'Here is the photo that I took and this is exactly what it looked like when I took it?
... not showing 185 replies to this topic ... Register as a New User or login to gain full access to the forums. Registration is quick and completely free. If you are definitely logged on, press Ctrl+F5 keys to reload this page [read more]
Unregistered users can only read messages in the most recent topics.
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.