Hi,
You're comparing an in-mould with a hard-shell. They live in two different realms. The Salamander is an excellent ice climbing and general mountaineering helmet. It's not that light, but it's very durable. I've been having mine for few years now and it's only got few scratches, no dents, nothing to raise any concern. The only thing I don't like about it is the rear wheel which is not adjustable in height and it broke once, though Grivel promptly replaced it free of charge (it was within the warranty period). It fits me well, but I wonder whether it fits that well anyone else. In fact, they have a Small and a XL version too. No wonder. It comes with optional extra padding for the sides which I am in fact using. Not the simplest chin strap to adjust. In-moulds are all a lot lighter and generally more ventilated. I use a Scarab which is conceptually not that different from the Meteor III you're looking at, which by the way is widely appreciated, or any other in-mould helmet for that matter. It's multi purpose and EN-rated for different sports too. I use mine in the summer. I used it in winter too, but personally I find it a little too fragile. I dropped it once and it's already got a dent. Everyone I know who uses in-mould helmets have gone through few of them already. But they bought them again, which tells me ultimately they're worth it. In-moulds are the only helmets that people can claim they forget they have it on, imo. A bit of a marketing talk there, but you know what I mean. Hope the above helps.
Ciao!
Nic
Post edited at 14:33