UKC

Wolf Creek II

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
> As brutal and unforgiving as the first movie was, and as disreputable the genre in which it excelled, the original Wolf Creek did what an Australian film is supposed to do.

> It held up a mirror and not one that was part of the official story. It wasn't comforting, which might explain why Jarratt was overlooked in the national film awards that year for the best performance of his long career.

> The sequel, eight years later, expands upon the same themes. It is bigger and louder and just as bloody, but Mick says a lot more this time around, most of it unrepeatable. He doesn't like foreigners, be they ''f---ing Krauts'' or ''Pommy c---s''. He's a bit like Bazza McKenzie, but the layers of misogyny and xenophobia have putrefied. He may be a Vietnam vet, which would explain why he's such a great shot. In the first movie, he says he got the ''head on a stick'' idea from that conflict, although he doesn't say that he was there.

> His victims this time include a young German couple who go into the outback without proper respect for the dangers. Katarina (Shannon Ashlyn) and Rutger (Philippe Klaus) hitchhike to the Wolfe Creek crater in WA, to experience a sense of space unlike anything in Europe. They misjudge the return and have to camp. Mick arrives like a saviour, to offer a lift into town. Katarina escapes and flags down a young British tourist (Ryan Corr) on the highway. The stalwart actors Gerard Kennedy and Annie Byron come to his aid in turn, after his first terrifying encounter with ''Uncle Mick''.

> The first film was made for $150,000 and with no limitation on McLean's vision. He was producer, writer and director and he had a lot of aggression to vent, after years of trying to get a feature made. The second film comes after the worldwide success of the first and with more budget. That often ruins a sequel, but McLean has taken pains here both to respect what he created and extend it.

> The film has many of the same qualities: a nightmarish sense of humour, combined with bowel-twisting tension, and a clear sense of purpose and theme. There's a lot more road action with cars and trucks, and a script in which it remains hard to see what will happen.

> McLean co-wrote the film with horror novelist Aaron Sterns, the first time he has collaborated with another writer. The xenophobia is more explicit, as if to relate the film more directly to today's headlines, but I was glad Mick was more talkative. It usually meant he wasn't sticking a knife in someone's spinal chord or dismembering them - although not necessarily.

> The horror genre usually offers respite after all the bad things have happened, but that isn't quite true in the Wolf Creek series. We don't get to exhale at the end and think, ''phew''. We never know who will survive an encounter with Mick Taylor, or whether anyone will; and we can never know how many of his kind might be out there. Waiting.

> Throw another tourist on the barbie, Mick.

youtube.com/watch?v=s4bqeT5edbs&

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/entertainment/movies/wolf-creek-2-review-au...


I LOVED the original, this looks like a 'must see".
Removed User 22 Feb 2014
In reply to stroppygob:

>
> I LOVED the original, this looks like a 'must see".

Me too.
 Tom Valentine 22 Feb 2014
In reply to stroppygob:

The original was memorable, probably as being one of the nastiest films ever made. I don't look forward to more of the same.
 JH74 22 Feb 2014
In reply to Tom Valentine:

> The original was memorable, probably as being one of the nastiest films ever made. I don't look forward to more of the same.

+1. It was the first film/tv I'd seen in ages and I had to go for a walk afterwards to clear my head. Foul. I did watch it though.
 Choss 22 Feb 2014
In reply to JH74:

> +1. It was the first film/tv I'd seen in ages and I had to go for a walk afterwards to clear my head. Foul. I did watch it though.

I also found it a Thoroughly uncomfortable watch for some reason, and im a big horror fan not usually Fazed by any films.

our responses probably show the makers did a good job Though.

Wouldnt rewatch, and No Interest in seeing the Second to be honest.

Choss (a hater of torture porn)
 butteredfrog 22 Feb 2014
In reply to Choss:

"Mick" is chillingly well written and acted. It adds an uncomfortable realism that a lot horror films lack.

I have it on DVD, only watched it once and not sure if I want to watch it again.
Removed User 22 Feb 2014
In reply to butteredfrog:

> "Mick" is chillingly well written and acted. It adds an uncomfortable realism that a lot horror films lack.

> I have it on DVD, only watched it once and not sure if I want to watch it again.

I have watched it twice. It doesn't get any easier the 2nd time around. Reminded me of the original "Texas chainsaw massacre" although better (or worse depending on your perspective).
In reply to stroppygob:

I've only watched the original once, will probably watch the second one once too.

The scariness lies in the real chance that someone like him could actually walk amongst us.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowtown_murders

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backpacker_murders

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_John_Murdoch

Removed User 22 Feb 2014
In reply to Removed User:

I had colleagues who liked this sort of film and saw Wolf Creek with them once. I thought it was awful, nihilistic cheap torture porn, the sort of stuff a couple of drunk students came up with in the pub when they didn't have girlfriends.

I've seen the original Tobe Hooper Texas Chainsaw Massacre a couple of times. Of its genre, it is imho a masterpiece. Totally different sort of film.
Removed User 23 Feb 2014
In reply to Removed User:

> I had colleagues who liked this sort of film and saw Wolf Creek with them once. I thought it was awful, nihilistic cheap torture porn, the sort of stuff a couple of drunk students came up with in the pub when they didn't have girlfriends.

> I've seen the original Tobe Hooper Texas Chainsaw Massacre a couple of times. Of its genre, it is imho a masterpiece. Totally different sort of film.

Right, that's me told then.
 Skol 23 Feb 2014
In reply to stroppygob:

The first film was probably the most scary film that I've seen. Too believable.
I'll recommend it to my daughter before her gap year. No one should ever go to that god forsaken place called Australia. I bet it does wonders for the tourist trade?

The first one was on sky here 2 weeks ago and I recorded it. In a moment of clarity it was deleted
Redacted 23 Feb 2014
In reply to Skol:

I couldn't watch it, i got to the part where he is chasing one lassie in his pick-up truck and got so angry with the wee shit that i had to turn it off.
 Bobling 25 Feb 2014
In reply to stroppygob:

I watched the first one along with other nuggets of Australiana (Razorback - anyone else seen that one?) before heading off to Oz for the essential fruit picking campervan experience. Scary yes, torture porn? No. Sure it was up to date with some of the gore but it conveyed it's point very well - in Australia no one can hear you scream, or at least once you get away from the cities. I spent most of the next day trying to work out if I was going to buy a satellite phone to take with us, we didn't in the end and did get to some extremely remote places and lived to tell the tale. The ghost of this film was still in my head all the way though and at various points did whisper in my ear that caution was in order.


One of things we did early on in our travels was to cross the Nullarbor, you can really imagine this sort of stuff happening round there. I did hear tell of nullarbor pirates later on - a mate said that when he was young he'd driven across that road a couple of times with his dad and brothers. If they ever had mechanical problems the first thing to happen after they stopped would be for his dad to tell one one of them to get the rifle and stand somewhere in plain sight with it to let anyone who was interested know they were not defenceless. True this is probably going back 40 years or so but it's a good story. Shame that he was telling it to a young lady who was about to drive over it single handed in a dodgy old camper - and no he was not trying to put the sh*ts up her for the fun of it - he was honestly concerned about her safety driving round as a young unaccompanied female. He was pretty old school though, spent his life in the army and had a lot of the 'phobias which rural Asutralia is famous for.
 Tom Valentine 25 Feb 2014
In reply to Bobling:

Always been a big fan of Razorback but it's not nasty like Wolf Creek.
In fact, David Argue's Dicko is one of the most endearing villains in cinema and there is a fair amount of black comedy in it.
 Blue Straggler 25 Feb 2014
In reply to Bobling:

> Scary yes, torture porn? No. Sure it was up to date with some of the gore but it conveyed it's point very well - in Australia no one can hear you scream, or at least once you get away from the cities.

Agreed. It's not torture porn like the Hostel films (or perhaps the Saw series though I only watched the first Saw and thought it was a cut above what people call torture porn). It's just a nasty violent isolation "thriller". I didn't think it was that good - builds the suspense well in the first half but becomes boring when the violence starts.

Best in this genre (torture porn rather than Australiana) is the French film "Martyrs" as it actually offers an interesting explanation of the antagonists' motives, and some back story for the victims. Very hard to watch though.
 Choss 25 Feb 2014
In reply to Blue Straggler:

My fave Aussie horror that ive seen is Primal.

Slightly off topic but one of my fave films of all Times is Aussie. Mr reliable.

And they do some Cracking Kids stuff.
In reply to Blue Straggler:

Not seen Martyrs, but how about Man bites Dog? I suppose it's more a black comedy, but plenty of killing and a particularly gruesome rape scene
In reply to Choss:

The Castle is my favourite Aussie film. Hilarious feel good comedy. Very Australian
 Blue Straggler 25 Feb 2014
In reply to Bjartur i Sumarhus:

Saw Man Bites Dog when I was about 19 and I thought it was good and funny. Tried watching it when I was about 34 and I had to turn it off, it was all a bit much!
 Blue Straggler 25 Feb 2014
In reply to Bjartur i Sumarhus:

> The Castle is my favourite Aussie film. Hilarious feel good comedy. Very Australian

It counts as a horror film thanks the terrifying mullets on display

Love it, seen it three times.
"Which PART of the constitution?"
"Well....just....the general....VIBE of it"

 Bobling 25 Feb 2014
In reply to Blue Straggler:
"How's the serenity?"
"Straight to the pool room"
"Rissoles!"

Yeah enjoyed that one.
Post edited at 13:19
In reply to Bobling: I can't remember exactly but looking through the classifieds in local rag...

"Jousting sticks - $50 ? "

"Tell 'em they're dreaming"
 Blue Straggler 25 Feb 2014
In reply to Bobling:

"Sponge....cake"
and the legendary Dennis and his urgent legal note "Glass of water?"
 Skol 26 Feb 2014
In reply to Blue Straggler:
This was well funny. Not as good as Dog Soldiers though.

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=20&ved=0CKABELc...
Removed User 26 Feb 2014
In reply to Skol:

That looks good.

This is essential viewing: The Revenge of Billy the Kid. I've only known of two other people who've seen it and one of them posts on here.

youtube.com/watch?v=0pIfFNbm2bk&

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
Loading Notifications...