UKC

1. That there's a god who cares for us, has a plan for us and is the least bit concerned about what we do for fun with our genitals.
2. That voting ever has or ever could change anything apart from the cast of clowns in a meaningless pantomime.
3. That anything on television is worth a moment's attention.
4. That attacking an obvious typo constitutes any kind of rational argument.
5. That one particular molecular formation of carbon-based elements is somehow superior to another.
6. That anyone can be really, really certain of anything.
7. That Coel Hellier is an expert on anything but cataclysmic stars.
8. That anybody ever did anything meaningful on a handful of conglomerated particles of sand.
9. That the crags are far less colourful than they used to be and that 'polish' is acceptable.
10. That compiling stupid and ill-informed lists is a neat idea.

Glove and Grease,
Chambers!

In reply to Chambers:

I got to number 4 and simply could not read on, old chap. Typos are a clear sign of the downfall of Western civilization and must be pointed out: and doing that constitutes a brilliant, irrefutable, astounding argument.

Signed
Abseil
A pedant

I'm know god still loves you, Chambers.

In reply to needvert:

No other f*cker does though.

In reply to stroppygob:

Apart from you and mommy, guppystroke. xxx

In reply to Chambers:

Hey... where you been hiding buddy?

Good to have you Back...

In reply to abseil:

Can you write that in English please, so that we can all understand what you are trying to say.

Yours,

A man very tolerant to typos as long as they don't distort understanding.

In reply to Chambers:

Actually I think stroppy has been missing you, he has been accusing various people of being you.

As for the list, I agree on about 50%, which is a pretty good result on here.

In reply to Chambers:

Got to disagree with 3. A few moments should be spared to watch big bang theory .

In reply to broken spectre:



Hiding? Nah. Just busy...

In reply to marsbar:

Laugh tracks make me gag to be honest.

In reply to needvert:


I suspect not. Depends on which 'god' you're talking about, I guess. They're all man-made, of course, and none are real, but I imagine that me and Thor could have some cool runnings together until the hammers ran out.

In reply to Offwidth:

It's the syntax that renders it meaningless.

In reply to marsbar:


Agreed. I'd never seen that till I met my wife. I watched two episodes at her behest. Sheldon's like Gobbystrop - my little brother - and the same joke gets tedious.

In reply to The New NickB:



Da Stropster doesn't exist without me. Thus much is true. He struggles to handle the fact that he needs me whilst I have no need of him.

I'm glad that we agree about some things, but I'm more interested in exploring the areas where we disagree...

In reply to Chambers:
I agree points 2 & 3 God knows the rest!
Paul

In reply to Paul Troon:

Can you explain how god knows that?

In reply to Chambers:

If could explain how God knows would he be God