/ NEW ARTICLE: Everest Tragedy Part 2: Day of the Avalanche
Read more at http://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/page.php?id=6401
Are there any first hand accounts which don't originate from western guides or clients? In the interests of being even handed could UKC get an account from one of the liaison officers or someone from the Nepalese Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation?
UKC are not interested in being even handed. They are interested in supporting the western guiding companies who advertise with them.
I hate to say it, but I don't think this is a very good way of going about things in trying to record events. This is not 'the facts'. This is an opinion piece by one person involved, and to be honest, it just makes the whole Everest circus look even more unattractive.
Isn't gravity is the main cause of this tragedy?
I agree. It is wrong to suggest this is a news item rather than an opinion piece by someone who also has a commercial interest. What happened was a tragedy exacerbated in part by the fact that so many people are allowed on the mountain at one time. The guiding companies may well have acted with bravery and determination after the event but surely it is as much up to them as liaison officers and government officials to ensure that there are limits on the number of people climbing Everest every year. With less people the risks of tragedies like this are reduced, even if it does cut into profit margins. Everest has had terrible press in the recent past and everyone involved has to accept that they might have a role to play in ensuring that this changes in the future.
These "articles" leave a very bad taste in the mouth. Really shabby on UKC's part to put these up.
I don't want to hear from operators. I want journalism.
Looks like I'm going to have to go elsewhere for that.
(The Grauniad [ http://www.theguardian.com/world/everest ] and the Alpinist [ http://alpinist.com/doc/web14s/wfeature-everest-myth ] make it glaringly obvious how limited UKC's reportage is)
Yes, somewhat misleading title : "The Facts", very thin on these.
Guiding company blames ministry - shock horror.
I also found the repetitive reference to "my Sherpas" slightly jarring. I wonder if 'they' thought they were 'his'?
"Each LO is paid $2,500 plus travel expenses, so this spring we as expedition teams paid a little under $100,000 for nothing. Where did this money actually go? "
And how much, to put that in the smallest bit of context, does each client pay for the expedition? $50-60,000? The distribution of wealth here is hardly something to point fingers at coming from a commercial western position.
This is not 'fact' (to quote the title) based journalism without an attempt to research or reach alternate opinions, this is an opinion piece at best.
How would you prefer him to refer to them?
I think it's more a question of how the people from the Khumbu would refer to themselves.
Have a read of Life and Death on mt Everest by Sherry Ortner; it's not brilliant, but sheds more light on a complex set of relationships; providing helpful context to this particular disaster.
Is he saying it like 'my porters' or 'my ethnic group'. Probably o.k if its the first.
This 100%. Honestly rename or take this down UKC.
Where is it suggested that this is a news item? The title is "NEW ARTICLE" not "NEWS ARTICLE". And the introduction says "Below is the second in a series of pieces from a Western operator's perspective"
It's just been edited. Thanks UKC.
There seems something morally wrong with linking a tragedy with commercial gain, which is what this article quite blatantly does.
Maybe something like 'Russell Brice' Everest guide would be more appropriate rather than having a direct link to his website from where it's possible to sign up for an Everest trip or similar.
As a direct result I'll be using this site considerably less.
Just a shame the UKC couldn't do a proper job editing the introduction, which still selectively emphasises the apparent significance of "bungling officials" hampering rescue efforts.
i reckon Brice's observations are worth reading. if i were Sherpa, i'd like to be part of his team..
Is that a joke?
Why don't you expand on that a bit?
How can I expand on a question?
Is it, or is it not, something designed to be funny?
Better for you?
No. Which part of his reply did you think was a joke?
All of it, none of it? He hasn't told me yet. I'm unsure if he's being serious, could go either way.
Not a very difficult question to answer. Which bit do you think he's joking about? To help you I've quoted the possible answers below.
If he's making a sarcastic response, it's most likely that the entirety of the post is sarcastic, its not that long. If you like, I think all of 1, 2, 3 could be a joke. That's what I meant by 'all of it', literally the first 3 words of my last post but easy to miss I suppose.
Whereas you are always balanced and polite :-)
not joking. i've read a bit about him and he seems to be one of the better guys in the world of everest operators..
Tough going this forum haha. Fair enough. Best of a bad bunch.
I did think that maybe you had some reason to doubt malk's sincerity so obviously. You know, like perhaps you know Russel Brice personally or even slightly, or had had dealings with him.
Everyone else in this thread has criticised a biased and poorly written article written by a commercial operator on Everest. It's not like he would have been first in line. I thought he was being sarcastic, possibly, yes.
Malk thinks he's one of the better operators, although putting it across as 'if I was a sherpa', (sorry malk) is a little crass and I thought it could have gone either way. Also his use of a couple of full stops and the exaggerated use of 'family' as opposed to something more tempered as ‘colleagues' or 'friends' also hinted that way. As I said, it could have gone either way.
As it stands I don't give a shit about the author, it's a terrible article that was originally labled 'The Facts', with a link to his commercial website. It's actually a opinion piece designed to throw as much mud at the Nepalese government as possible, even how a Nepalese government official did not respect people of his 'repute'.There were many allegations of grievances without giving the (any) other side of the story. All of this is as far removed from the facts as possible, UKC should not have published it.
Have you been to Nepal? Have you been to the Himalaya? Have you been involved in a commercial expedition? Have you met or know anything about Russel Brice? I'm sorry Mr Wolfo but you're spouting from a very uninformed view point and until you have a little bit more knowledge and experience it's better you wind your neck in.
The article is shit and biased, that statement is not a character assassination, it's a critique of some pretty dodgy writing clearly affected by commercial interests. All we get from this is that he wants a regime more sympathetic to western guiding companies. I've given my reasons, you've said nothing. Do you honestly think this is a impartial and comprehensive account of events suitable of the sub-heading, 'the facts'? I'm interested in hearing these arguments but I imagine you'll just post some fluff again about not knowing how many dogs Brice has.
Elsewhere on the site
Pete Whittaker has flashed the 32 pitch route Freerider 5.12d on El Capitan in Yosemite Valley over three days,... Read more
Last year, Finn McCann wrote an article about climbing El Capitan with his terminally ill father Seamus, who had been... Read more
A fantastically versatile little pack; whether out running in the hills, hitting the trails on the bike or just running for the... Read more
Manchester Climbing Centre is showing Reel Rock’s Valley Uprising on Tuesday the 11th of November at... Read more