In reply to FesteringSore:
> It seems this is due to the fact that some people suffer from "nut allergies"; yet I remember flying in the sixties, seventies and eighties when nuts were freely available - usually as a snack with a drink - on flights. I have flown long haul and domestic frequently and never been aware of a problem.
> This, and other "food allergies" appear to have become more "publicised" within the last twenty or thirty years.
Why the inverted commas? People really do get severely ill from nut allergies, and it isn't particularly rare.
An aeroplane doesn't seem like the best place to be when you suddenly need hospital care, either!
Anecdotally, a colleague's wife has to carry an EpiPen at all times due to suffering from anaphylaxis on exposure to peanuts, and a school classmate of my wife died from anaphylaxis after eating something that turned out to not be peanut-free after all.
> I do wonder if it's something to do with "modern living"
Maybe. Or is it just that diagnosis is better?
> and if the banning of nuts by the airlines is a product of the compensation culture.
If you mean that they're penalised by their insurance companies, for failing to take measures, to reduce the risk of claims, by trying to keep their passengers safer - then probably! I don't see this as a bad thing, though.