UKC

Misleading Envelope

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
 mypyrex 29 Oct 2014

I had an item of correspondence in the post today. It was a brown window envelope and the way the address appeared in the window, along with the size of the envelope and the way the return address was printed on the back it looked deceptively like a communication from a government department.

It was, in fact, a letter trying to persuade me to take out an extended warranty on my pc.

Anyone else had similarly deceptive envelopes?
Post edited at 12:36
1
In reply to mypyrex:

Yes I have. It was clearly from a running magazine, I could tell from the frank. But then I looked again, and I realised it was stationary.
OP mypyrex 29 Oct 2014
In reply to Bjartur i Sumarhus:

> Yes I have. It was clearly from a running magazine, I could tell from the frank. But then I looked again, and I realised it was stationary.

I would get your coat if I were you.
 toad 29 Oct 2014
In reply to mypyrex:

Just every bit of junk that comes through my door from Virgin. Sometimes 2 or3 a week.
 Rampikino 29 Oct 2014
In reply to mypyrex:

Yes, especially before I went on the mail preference service thingy. Sadly it's one of those devious little things that sellers do to get their promotion in front of your eyes and this is because of the "cost to acquire" of any new account or service. In order to get one person to sign up they have to post out many dozens of promotions to other people and it costs money.

The % of people who open junk is already very very low and so companies will try anything to get you to at least consider their offer and the fake-official envelopes are one of them.

Gladly it only takes moments to dismiss it and throw it in the recycling.
OP mypyrex 29 Oct 2014
In reply to Rampikino:


> The % of people who open junk is already very very low and so companies will try anything to get you to at least consider their offer and the fake-official envelopes are one of them.

> Gladly it only takes moments to dismiss it and throw it in the recycling.
Bit like the tactics Readers Digest Prize Draw (used to) use. Not seen them around for years. Did they get rumbled?
JMGLondon 29 Oct 2014
In reply to mypyrex:

Thing is, these companies (including banks) send this official looking crap to vulnerable people who don't know it's junk. I'm forever explaining to my girlfriends Gran that she doesn't need to worry about a 0% balance transfer, a new boiler, or a new gas supplier.

I think all junk mail, by law, should have 'UNSOLICITED MAIL' printed in bold letters on the envelope.
 Rampikino 29 Oct 2014
In reply to JMGLondon:

Are there regulations on this? I'm not sure. I think it's OFT territory ie:

An advert is misleading if, by its words or image, it deceives or is likely to deceive and so persuades, or is likely to persuade, you to spend your money or to change how you spend your money (for example, by persuading you to change from one credit card to another). Misleading adverts may: contain lies; leave out or hide important facts; make a promise which will not be carried out; or create a false impression - even though everything in it may be true.

What the law says

One of the duties of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is to help control all advertising, except that on TV and radio and for certain types of financial investments. They can ask the courts to stop any misleading advert. OFT can only act if they get a complaint about a particular advert. They have no power to get compensation for anyone who may have lost money as a result of a misleading advert
 Rampikino 29 Oct 2014
In reply to mypyrex:

Not sure - not seen them in ages. I think it was a marketing ploy where very, very few people actually won and was bordering on scam.
 Rampikino 29 Oct 2014
In reply to mypyrex:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8520243.stm

Interesting - seems to suggest to prize draw was genuine!
Clauso 29 Oct 2014
In reply to mypyrex:

I once received an envelope marked Parcel Force and, quite understandably, assumed that it was my conscription papers for a newly-formed branch of the armed services.

Fortunately, a quick call to the Ministry of Defence was able able to put my mind at rest.
OP mypyrex 29 Oct 2014
In reply to Rampikino:

> Are there regulations on this? I'm not sure. I think it's OFT territory ie:

Found this:
http://www.cap.org.uk/Advice-Training-on-the-rules/Advice-Online-Database/E...
 wilkie14c 29 Oct 2014
In reply to mypyrex:

> Bit like the tactics Readers Digest Prize Draw (used to) use. Not seen them around for years. Did they get rumbled?

I hope they didn't get rumbled, I made it through to the final stages of the draw
OP mypyrex 29 Oct 2014
In reply to wilkie14c:

> I hope they didn't get rumbled, I made it through to the final stages of the draw

Ten years ago?
 Hooo 29 Oct 2014
In reply to mypyrex:

BT are the worst for this. I get endless junk from them, masquerading as relevant mail. As I'm a customer I'm a bit nervous about automatically recycling it all unopened. For a while I sent it all back marked return to sender, but it didn't help.
abseil 30 Oct 2014
In reply to Hooo:

> ...As I'm a customer I'm a bit nervous about automatically recycling it all unopened...

Too right. I once ripped up an envelope that contained a cheque for me in my name (I realized too late - I thought it was junk mail), to the watching baby Abseil's great amusement. I had to get a replacement cheque.

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
Loading Notifications...