In reply to mmmhumous:
> Here's Black Diamond Europes thoughts:
> "Surely lots of controversy surrounding this topic. If the leash were to be built to a higher load rating this might lead to a false sense of security. Even if it were built to withstand higher loads, the ice axe cannot be thought of as an anchor as it is clearly not an anchor. A leash could be built like a via ferrata leash, but this comes back around to the ice axe not being a good anchor point. Other arguments could be that the via ferrata leash is heavier and bulkier, much!"
And Now DMM have got back to me too:
" There are a few reasons that we rate the freedom leash to 2kN:
Having a low rating, allows the leash to be of a lightweight, user friendly design.
In the event of a leader fall that may generate high impact forces, if the axe is in a solid placement, the leash may break, absorbing some impact from your fall onto your protection system. If the leash had a high kN rating, there is a possibility of generating high impact forces directly onto the climber’s harness.
In the event of a fall (rather than a slump onto the axes) with the axes in a very good placement, the leash is more likely to break, meaning you’re less likely to be hit by a falling ice axe on your way down."