In reply to Al Cartwright:
> Trees that you can assess, how well routed they are sure, but we were cautioned against using stakes that could potentially be rusted just below the surface.
Again we were taught to have a good look, shake, pull back grass at base to look for rust; and even then always back-up.
Would be interesting to know how consistent assessment is, especially as I'm sure I read advice on this forum (different thread) not to go to same person for training and assessment. (Think the MLT site gives opposing advise but too lazy right now to check.)
Again (not sure how to lift another quote) someone above says if assessor questions your set up don't try to defend it. We were told if questioned it would be to see if we knew why we were doing what we were doing, not just reproducing what we had seen/been taught.
The instructor we had seemed keen to stress that there were several different ways to do most things, he taught/demonstrated/used those he felt most comfortable/familiar with but was happy for folk to use any techniques that they could demonstrate to be safe. Is this representative of approach most assessors adopt?