In reply to alexm198:
> Awesome, thanks Jack. Yeah I definitely hear what you're saying about categorisation. I think like HeMa says, the issue could be solved by being able to apply primary and secondary grades for an alpine route, much like how big lines get given grades like "ED2, 5+ M6 1200m" or whatever.
Yes, I'm a firm beleiver on the secondary "grade". In my opinion it could also be useful for non alpine stuff. E.g. UK trad and Scottish Winter grades are not that well understood outside the island you reside. For rock, giving the French grade might be helpful and the same thing for Scottish grades. Naturally this would be useful useful for UK climbers, as now they could also add their UK trad grade (or scottish winter grade) to YDS, french, UIAA or what ever system the climb was originally inserted...
In fact, if talkin' about rock climbs, each entry should actually contain atleast options for UK Trad, French grade and most likely UIAA grades plus the alpine grade. Naturally this being a UK site, if given the UK Trad would be the primary "grade" and the rest (if given) would be to help others. That said, local guidebook grades should be instructed to be always given.
But revamping the DB might be quite a bit more work. But this is something I'd really consider.