In reply to stp:
I usually really enjoy watching the boulder comps but I was pretty disappointed by this one for a number of reasons:
1) The actual video streaming. I don't want to be too harsh, I know this will be pretty low budget and probably put together by people on a semi-voluntary basis but it was pretty poor. Excluding the fact that the stream went down for a decent chunk of the finals (not necessarily IFSC's fault) but it felt like a few key moments were totally missed, like people topping out off screen while watching someone repeatably fall off the start of a problem..
2) The setting/route types. To quote someone on Twitter, 'do they not have holds in Europe?'. The semis in particular seemed overkill by volumes, and very far removed from actual bouldering at all (even further than normal!). Several of the competitors expressed their obvious frustration at the lack of actual 'pull hard' problems. Might just be personal but half the fun is watching people jump around doing wild moves rather than watch all competitors repeatedly slip off the same foothold (e.g. women's 4)
3) This comp really seemed to highlight some key weaknesses in the scoring. A good example would be Dave Barrans in the semi's who got further than anyone else on one bloc (only one of two to get the bonus) but because he didn't top, got no credit. Some sort of points per hold system as in the Sisu Masters would have led to quite a different ranking! Finally, it felt that Martin Sradik was robbed of first place, despite having both feet on the bonus, standing up on it and going for the last hold, because he didn't actually touch the bonus with his hand (sort of his own fault, he could have easily reached down), it wasn't awarded to him. Irritating that it just came down to a technicality rather than climbing performance..
That all said, the actual standard of the competitors was impressively high and it was great to see so many GB members performing well! Good luck with the rest of the season!