In reply to Wry Gob:
> I have to disagree John; basically you're saying is that if you come across a blank wall in the mountains, it's OK to go to the top of the mountain, abseil down and bolt it? That we should apply the same ethic to desert mountain rock as we do to UK limestone? That's a very long way from what I understood to be the established ethic in Rum.
I think if you come across a genuinely unprotectable wall in the mountains there would be a good case for accepting that bolting it may be a reasonable way to climbing something that otherwise would have no active value to climbers. This is pretty hypothetical though since mountain environments tend not to fall into this category due to freeze-thaw cracking. Walls such as those in Tsaranoro in Madagascar are a very good example of how it can work to very good effect. It's really only where there's a real choice of climbing style on the same rock that contention is likely, not usually when there is only one reasonably possible style.
> That said, I guess in truth you're probably just reflecting the majority view today, which seems increasingly more about us 'having our fun' and less about being sensitive to the places we're climbing in. Maybe I need to shut up, go away and accept I'm just a dinosaur!
What is climbing if not challenge-based fun, usually in a beautiful environment? I don't really buy the environmental destruction argument, even though I'm very sensitive to the risk of removing options for climbing in a more fulfilling way where that could be possible. IMO bolting needs to be justified on grounds that don't involve convenience or availability/cost of trad gear, but such justifications at times do exist and are reasonable.
> I just think it'd be a shame if we didn't at least make an effort to preserve a ground-up approach in mountain regions like Rum. The place is vast, and there's endless scope out there for folk to climb ground-up to at least E6, if not harder. If the goal is simply to make everything climbable, that doesn't leave much for the imagination?
I'd agree completely, except that I'm not a fan of ground-up bolting and nobody is suggesting any goal of making everything climbable, just adding an option for faces that otherwise wouldn't even have a chance of being climbed. Experience from closer to home suggests that a ground-up approach has enduring appeal, being more popular again nowadays after a long period of headpointing during the 90s and 00s.