In reply to Toby_W:
> VW seem to disagree, the guy emailed them saying he had gotten a ticket driving his khombi. There is a huge thread (the mirror to what we are saying)pinned thread on the t4/5 forums.
Yes, there is great confusion. I just read an article from a few years back about how dealers, civil servants, even the police seemed to be a bit baffled by the whole thing and often contradicted each other. Apparently not much has changed.
The dealer you're quoting there seems to be suggesting your Kombi is a mini-bus. That can't be right can it? I wouldn't call a 5-seater a minibus, would you? Referring to the Construction and Use regulations yet again (because they are about as definitive as it gets I think) a mini-bus is "a motor vehicle which is constructed or adapted to carry more than 8 but not more than 16 seated passengers in addition to the driver", so that seems pretty clear.
If it's registered in category "M1" and the taxation class is "Diesel Car" it seems it's not a goods vehicle either - your van might not only have the same speed limits as a car, could turn out that it actually *is* a car.
> There are several docs on the dvla site but all caravels and khombi vans have removable rear seats so don't meet the duel purpose bit.
Docs other than the ones I've posted links to? Got a link?
Seems to me the "removable rear seats" is the first thing you've mentioned that dent my argument. Because the Construction and Use Regulations I've been referring to say the van must:
"be permanently fitted with at least one row of transverse seats (fixed or folding) for two or more passengers and those seats must be properly sprung or cushioned and provided with upholstered back-rests, attached either to the seats or to a side or the floor of the vehicle"
So that would hinge on what is meant by "permanently fitted" wouldn't it? If it means a seat that cannot ever be removed, you'd be right. But that seems daft to me, because all of the seats in a car, van or bus are removable - so why make that distinction?
I would contend that a proper seat, with a seat belt, bolted to proper mounting points in the floor qualifies as "permanent", even though you could unbolt it and remove it the same as you could with the front passenger seat or the driver's seat (or the brakes or the engine for that matter), and the word "permanent" in the regulation is there to distinguish proper rear seats from something like a bench or a rock & roll bed.
> To be honest I would not bet on either of us being 100% correct
The thing regarding the seats above is the only thing I've posted that seems at all ambiguous tbh.
(And that doesn't come into play if the van is 4WD - it's a dual purpose vehicle even if it's a 2-seater panel van - how weird is that? I almost bought a 4WD Transit a few years back, glad I didn't, it almost certainly would have been a ludicrous money pit.)
Perhaps more to the point, it isn't just you and me - I wouldn't bet on a couple of coppers in a patrol car or a magistrate being 100% correct either. So you're probably right to be cautious. Ironically, sounds like you're more cautious than me, in my 3-seater panel van with no wiggle room to argue its "dual purpose" whatsoever. Good for you mate. :O)