Everest: Fewer Climbers = Bigger Fees?by Dougald MacDonald Jun/2008
This news story has been read 26,309 times
...a more likely explanation for limiting the number of visitors is continuing concern about adverse publicity at a time of Tibetan unrest.
Another possible explanation for restricting numbers on Everest: supply and demand. The Chinese may be hoping to raise peak fees again by limiting the number of permits. Currently, peak fees on Everest are much higher on the Nepali side of the mountain. In Tibet the fee was just $4,900 per person in 2007, the last time the mountain was open. But the fee jumped more than 60 percent that year.
Read more on Dougald MacDonald's Blog: The Mountain World
Discovery Channel News Item: Limit on Everest
Over the hill? The wrong side of 40? Too many birthdays? Age is often used as an excuse to slow down and pursue less adventurous... Read more
British climbers Matt Burdekin and Tom Ripley have made the first ascent of a new line on the East Face of Aguja Bifida Sur... Read more
Tim Emmett and Slovenian climber Klemen Premrl have established a remarkable new line at Helmcken Falls in Canada, which the pair... Read more