MCofS News: Roads, Access and the Scottish Climbing Code of Practiceby Mick Ryan - UKC Dec/2009
This news story has been read 3,817 times
Already mentioned and discussed at UKClimbing.com is the potential opening of government owned tracks in some Scottish mountain areas to vehicles to make access easier, meaning that you can drive rather than walk.
The position of the MCofS up until now is against such opening of tracks to vehicular access for several reasons including increased erosion caused by vehicles in the mountain environment and where possible to keep mountain areas 'wild' by promoting low impact non-motorised recreation.
As a mountain user your comments are needed.
Hebe has also been involved with discussions with Peter Peacock MSP for Highlands & Islands about the damaging impact of new tracks in the Scottish mountains and questions have been asked in the Scottish Parliament this week.
As climbing becomes more popular and visible, land owners where climbing takes place are understandably concerned about liability issues and contact the MCofS for clarification about what climbing is all about.
To work with land owners and also to comply with the Land Reform Act and the Scottish Outdoor Access Code, the MCofS has drawn up a consultation document that requires your comments.
You can read the MCofS's draft Scottish Climbing Code of Practice (Summer & Winter)
This week's Friday Nighter is from . Here's what they say: "This harrowing expedition pushed a group of... Read more
Late in the season, when temperature and humidity perhaps shouldn't really allow it, Dave Graham has made the second... Read more
Hot on Alex Megos' heels, Jakob Schubert has made the 3rd ascent of Adam Ondra's Thor's hammer, 9a+, in the Flatanger... Read more
Tonight's Friday Night Video features a portrait of Robin Campbell, the recipient of the 2015 Award for Excellence in... Read more
BMCtv have released a groundbreaking video featuring their fastidious efforts to resolve a burning... Read more
*April Fool alert - this article is factually incorrect and contains poor jokes. You can breathe a sigh of relief - the... Read more