In reply to ben b:
I thought this was interesting, partly because a) it's been so long since the summit fell off (over 20 years) and b) that they didn't step right on top, or put the GPS on top, because of Maori spiritual beliefs.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11187423
I'm fine with climbers stopping a metre or two below out of respect to those beliefs, but I would have thought if you're going for a sub-metre DGPS reading, in the name of getting the most scientifically accurate result, then you would bite the bullet and put it right on top.
In this case it doesn't matter so much, as there is no rival for highest - Tasman is 300m lower - and it confirmed their suspicion the current accepted height was 'tens of metres' off, which is useful.
But given the scientific accuracy possible, and the whole aim was to get a new, accurate height, to what degree can science be subjugated to spiritualism?
Post edited at 10:02