In reply to Milesy: Thanks, I'll try to get hold of a copy of that.
I watched the rest of the Storyville programme last night and it didn't get any better IMO. What was all the stuff at the end about, trying to pick apart Pemba's and Confortola's accounts apparently in an attempt to put the best possible light on McDonell's actions? I don't think there's any doubt that he put in a lot of effort to try to help the Korean team, but I don't see any reason to imply - as the programme seemed to do - that Confortola was being evasive or deliberately misleading in the accounts he gave of what went on up there, while apparently glossing over the effort that the Italian had himself put in to try to help the Koreans - an effort that ended up with him so exhausted that he had to be rescued.
The director is quoted on the BBC web site as follows;
...when I was told that of every four people to have stood on the summit of K2 one has died trying to get there, I wanted to know why someone would put themselves at such risk. Not being a climber myself, it seemed a peculiar form of insanity, and in the light of the August 2008 summit attempt, a particularly tragic one.
I think that casts a rather disquieting light on the apparent motivations behind this film. Is he suggesting that, for example, McDonell's motivation was to be able to rescue people, hence the focus on him towards the end of the film? All a bit bizarre. Not to mention the director's logic: how can one in four of those who have summitted K2 died
trying to get there? That's as questionable as the assertion that K2 is "the world's deadliest mountain" (it's my understanding that Annapurna has a significantly higher % fatality rate).
So, as well as rather unforgivably crossing the line from dramatisation into sensationalism on more than one occasion, I think the programme's basic purpose was muddled, while some aspects of its account of the events seemed to have a covert agenda that it was unable to admit to.
But at least the pictures of K2 were pretty. So that's OK then.