A common test to check whether a bit of rope is damaged or not is to try bending it to see if it folds back on itself easily in a V sort of shape or whether it forms more of a U shape ( BMC video demonstrating the idea, with very obvious damage points, I'm thinking about more subtle 'failure' points where the rope just feels soft but looks ok). The idea being V shape bad, U shape ok. All the ropes I've used would make a U shape when new.
As far as I'm aware this is supposed to reveal core damage in the rope (maybe this is an incorrect assumption?), but I'm skeptical that it does. It seems to me that the test could be very influenced by the sheath condition - after all if you remove a short section of sheath on a new rope and bend that bit it won't make a U shape, it'll just fold easily. If it is just revealing sheath condition why would I care? I can look at the sheath and decide if it's ok or not.
Does anyone know of any evidence, have any experience or any theory as to whether the test works or is meaningful. E.g. has anyone ever cut the sheath off a section that failed the test and compared the core to a bit that passed the test?