In reply to Virginia Brown:
please ignore generalisations about impact and single vs double ropes because it entirely depends on the situation, the rope you are using and the way you are placing your gear. Yes you can reduce impact with double ropes, but the concept that using a single strand of double rope will reduce impact is pretty much a fallacy. Double ropes will only do so if two placements are made more or less parallel to one another, i.e. more or less at the same height and share some of the load. If you are clipping alternately and there is a substantial distance between placements, you will effectively load a singe strand. When looking at standards you will see impact force and this varies according to the type of test being conducted. The test in the case of double ropes is conducted with 50kg load whereas the single is done with an 80kg, which inevitably means that the impact force is higher on the single. If you conducted the double rope test with an 80kg load it will be similar to a single rope, and this is evidenced by looking at triple rated ropes, you will notice the single strand test is basically the same impact as a single rope.
Furthermore generalisations about diameter of rope and impact force are also a red herring, smaller diameter usually leads to higher impact force, not lower because the tighter diameter means the kern of the rope must be wound less, allowing for less elongation. It also restricts the thickness of the mantle, and determines the weave of the sheath, which in turn determines handleability and wear resistance. By and large the wider diameter the rope, the higher angle of attack the sheath can be woven at, allowing greater flexibility and greater elongation and hence lower impact forces.
The qualities you want from a trad rope are basically low impact force whereas for sport climbing its preferable to have durability which will correspond to higher impact force, somewhat contradicting one another. Finding a compromise is where you need to go.
If you can only afford one rope, choose something in the middle and you won't go far wrong. In terms of what you can do to mitigate the risk presented by poor placements, you can place closely placed clusters of gear thinking about a sacrificial pieces to protect a lower piece. Also make sure you have sufficiently long extenders to prevent drag. Personally I mainly climb on a single rope. I don't mind either system but rigidly sticking to doubles is a bit daft...