In reply to blueshound:
> (In reply to Nao)
>
> I'm from glasgow, don't find it offensive, but I find is is usually used as a veiled insult.
> If I am referred to as a "weedgie" I will reply with something guaranteed to offend.
See, if you don't find it offensive, why would you reply with an offensive comment? That doesn't make sense...
> I find it more offensive however, when used by southern english pansies who have never been north of birmingham (sorry if you find that offensive).
I don't find that offensive as I'm not Southern and I lived north of Birmingham for most of my life, so you obviously haven't directed it at me!
As I said before, it's all about the intent - you can use those words in different ways and the context is often more of a clue of offence given than the word itself. In general usage, yes, I would assume that the word 'chinky' would be intended to offend. Especially in Norrie's case as we all know how he likes to offend people. I don't take offence at Norrie because I know he's just a harmless old man.
In the 5 years I lived in Scotland with Glaswegians, the word 'weegie' was generally used as a term of endearment, like Brummie or Geordie, not with negative connotations (unless you followed it up with 'c*nt'). The Glaswegian people I knew all used it to describe themselves - not exclusively, not definitively, but I never met anyone who had an issue with it. When I used it in my post that Norrie took exception to, I meant it as a term of endearment and a nickname, rather than an indication that I somehow disliked Glaswegians. However, people on here have taken exception to it and it's obviously caused a bit of a furore (I am pretty sure I've used it before with no bother).
I would just end by saying that I think comparing it to 'chinky', 'paki' or 'n*gger' is not in my opinion a valid comparison, but no more than would be expected from Norrie.