Many thanks all for your interest.
Ridge was spot-on in the first part that there was an incorrect scope item I pointed out so advised the client in writing and told them I'd allowed $9k for doing it correctly.
This is the $9k they crunched me on.
To explain: There's a soffit [overhang] - underneath which I'm to install a monorail for rope access operators to connect to via a window at either end, connect ropes to the trolleys and climb out onto. The thing is the monorail snakes in & out all the way along its 140m length. The spec called up cast in ferrules [about 120] into the slab but there's no way in the world these can be placed with 1mm tolerance to line up with our pre-fabricated monorail supports. Hence I improved the spec by pricing for inverted, cast in 400mm long channels for installation tolerance. Except they aren't stocked in marine grade 316 stainless steel in Australia and am having them made overseas and flown in.
As was questioned in part 1: Why not do it to spec and when it goes wrong it's the client's problem? Well, I don't operate that way and contractually it'd be on me to rectify too.
'The last laugh' I alluded to though is that this $9k [being $6k + 50% mark up] I actually priced at four times higher to cover my back which means our nett result is not a bottom line loss rather a reduced 'cream on top' result.
Ahh friends, its a game contracting and we all play it. And I've not lost out yet.... and don't intend to.
Over & out on this one,
Thanks heaps,
Andy P.