https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/11/kremlin-us-strike-against-syr...
Is it not time somebody kept Tangoman away from twitter, before he starts WW3?
The real Tangoman is a great bloke, runs the Angler's Rest near me (and also Geeves's brewery)
The Evil of Banality .
This is the way the world ends:
Not with a Bang or a Whimper but with an almighty Trump.
This is a sort of Terry Pratchett endgame scenario. You've got to laugh.
Why be involved in a proxy war? Yes, the war crimes happening over there are despicable but how will seemingly everyone jumping in with their own version of ethical warfare help? It’s like seeing someone being poked in the eye and then someone else jumps in to punch the perpetrator square on the nose – just to demonstrate how to assault someone properly. It’s a bar brawl in slow motion.
Other options must be open without the situation descending into further chaos?
Yep, what's chilling me right now is, Trump, the man with the nuclear codes ,is apparently incapable of any form of self restraint.
> Yep, what's chilling me right now is, Trump, the man with the nuclear codes...
> I would like to think those in charge or the military just gave him some codes... not necessarily the correct ones. It helps me sleep at night.
I think there was a daily mash article along the lines of him being given a fake big red button when he won the presidency, and the fact he had pushed it forty seven times in the first few days.
Just goes to show you what you get when you allow a democracy the vote.
> Just goes to show you what you get when you allow a democracy the vote.
In defence of democracy (in this case anyway), Trump didn't get the most votes.
Nice strapline from the russians "We do not participate in Twitter diplomacy"
How do they explain this then:
Isn’t it about time for Playmobil to make a nice big shiny Presidential Nuclear Button, complete with pretend missile noises when you press it?
and we thought we needed that when Dubya was in charge....
Muller needs to get a move on.
On the plus side, the inevitable world cup penalty shoot out might be more interesting than usual.
Except it's tradition for us to lose those!
> Just goes to show you what you get when you allow a democracy the vote.
Would you like to live in China or Turkey or Russia?
> Just goes to show you what you get when you allow democracy to be bought.
Fixed.
</tinfoil hat>
It's time the USAians lived up to their past standards!
More than 30 attempts to kill an incumbent or former president, or a president-elect have been made since the early 1800s. Four sitting presidents have been killed, all of them by gunshot: Abraham Lincoln (1865), James A. Garfield (1881), William McKinley (1901) and John F. Kennedy (1963).
It’ll never happen, the gun lobby all love him.
Shooting him in the face is quicker, cheaper, and more effective.
Quicker and cheaper I'll give you. In terms of ensuring the long term health of democracy, jury trial and lengthy dose of porridge would be more effective.
In 1984 around 3000 people died because of a chemical leak from an American owned company in Bhopal, caused, it is believed, by slack management and poor maintenance. In 2012, over 100 people died in a fire in a factory making clothes for Walmart in Bangladesh. We in the west seem to be selective in the things we get dangerously indignant about.
Did Union Carbide have the potential to start a war with Russia?
Can I get the nuclear codes from Walmart?
And I don't think I'm "dangerously indignant" (whatever that means)
I wasn't suggesting you were dangerously indignant. I was suggesting our leaders were. And by that I mean claim to find something abhorrent when allowing terrible things to happen to people around the world in the name of capitalism.
> In 1984 around 3000 people died because of a chemical leak from an American owned company in Bhopal, caused, it is believed, by slack management and poor maintenance. In 2012, over 100 people died in a fire in a factory making clothes for Walmart in Bangladesh. We in the west seem to be selective in the things we get dangerously indignant about.
It's quite normal to be more indignant about deliberate killings over accidental ones.
> It's quite normal to be more indignant about deliberate killings over accidental ones.
What about negligent killings?
> In reply to Andy Hardy
> I wasn't suggesting you were dangerously indignant. I was suggesting our leaders were. And by that I mean claim to find something abhorrent when allowing terrible things to happen to people around the world in the name of capitalism.
Like those evil capitalists that caused Chernobyl you mean?
> What about negligent killings?
Would you feel more animosity to someone who accidentally ran you over while texting, or somebody who deliberately ran you over because you'd annoyed them in the pub?
Assuming I survived, I'd be pretty pissed off with both of them; both took a positive action that resulted in me being run over.
> Assuming I survived, I'd be pretty pissed off with both of them; both took a positive action that resulted in me being run over.
I would have thought most people would be more annoyed at a deliberate attempt on their life than an accidental one. The legal system certainly takes that view.
Those weren't accidents though were they?
Oh well that contradicts everything I said then doesn't it, one disaster with a fairly low confirmed death toll.
> Oh well that contradicts everything I said then doesn't it, one disaster with a fairly low confirmed death toll.
LOL!! I read that as; "Oh it's ok, when communists cause massive disasters leaving huge swathes of countryside uninhabitable, but what about them evil capitalists eh?!?!?!"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster#Human_impact
Of course it's OK, nothing bad was ever done in the name of communism. Why Jo Stalin didn't receive a Nobel prize baffles me. And Chernobyl was clearly a conspiracy by the CIA.
> On the plus side, the inevitable world cup penalty shoot out might be more interesting than usual.
On that subject a good sanction against Russia would be for everyone to boycot the world cup - but Im sure no one would want to go that far. Nuclear war a much more sensible option : )
Yes it's absolutely surreal that we are sending our boys out to Russia to play football. Also they are still selling us gas and stationing their security guards outside our public schools to protect their children from the other gangsters
> Yes it's absolutely surreal that we are sending our boys out to Russia to play football. Also they are still selling us gas and stationing their security guards outside our public schools to protect their children from the other gangsters
It'd be more surreal if we sent our boys to a country where the world cup wasn't happening. Send 'em to Trinidad or something instead.
We could buy our gas from Trinidad aswell. There might be a flaw in that plan but I can't see what it is.
We do have the best Public Schools tho and they now come with additional free security. So that's good.
Perhaps the Informonic wars will be won on the Playing fields of Russia